Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Utilizing High Resolution Ultrasound to Monitor Tumor Onset and Growth in Genetically Engineered Pancreatic Cancer Models
Published on: April 7, 2018
Automated Tumor and Node Staging from Esophageal Cancer Endoscopic Ultrasound Reports: A Benchmark of Advanced
Xudong Hu1, Lingde Feng1, Bingzhong Jing2
1Department of Endoscopy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Abstract:
Objectives: To benchmark the performance of DeepSeek-R1 against three other advanced AI reasoning models (GPT-4o, Qwen3, Grok-3) in automatically extracting T/N staging from esophageal cancer endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) complex medical reports, and to evaluate the impact of language (Chinese/English) and prompting strategy (with/without designed prompt) on model accuracy and robustness. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 625 EUS reports for T-staging and 579 for N-staging, which were collected from 663 patients at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between 2018 and 2020. A 2 × 2 factorial design (Language × Prompt) was employed under a zero-shot setting. The performance of the models was evaluated using accuracy, and the odds ratio (OR) was calculated to quantify the comparative performance advantage between models across different scenarios. Results: Performance was evaluated across four scenarios: (1) Chinese with-prompt, (2) Chinese without-prompt, (3) English with-prompt, and (4) English without-prompt. In both T and N-staging tasks, DeepSeek-R1 demonstrated superior overall performance compared to the competitors. For T-staging, the average accuracy was (DeepSeek-R1 vs. GPT-4o vs. Qwen3 vs. Grok-3: 91.4% vs. 84.2% vs. 89.5% vs. 81.3%). For N-staging, the respective average accuracy was 84.2% vs. 65.0% vs. 68.4% vs. 51.9%. Notably, N-staging proved more challenging than T-staging for all models, as indicated by lower accuracy. This superiority was most pronounced in the Chinese without-prompt T-staging scenario, where DeepSeek-R1 achieved significantly higher accuracy than GPT-4o (OR = 7.84, 95% CI [4.62-13.30], p < 0.001), Qwen3 (OR = 5.00, 95% CI [2.85-8.79], p < 0.001), and Grok-3 (OR = 6.47, 95% CI [4.30-9.74], p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study validates the feasibility and effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) for automated T/N staging from EUS reports. Our findings confirm that DeepSeek-R1 possesses strong intrinsic reasoning capabilities, achieving the most robust performance across diverse conditions, with the most pronounced advantage observed in the challenging English without-prompt N-staging task. By establishing a standardized, objective benchmark, DeepSeek-R1 mitigates inter-observer variability, and its deployment provides a reliable foundation for guiding precise, individualized treatment planning for esophageal cancer patients.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Reason and Intuition
Reasoning
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Deductive Reasoning
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
Crossing Over
The homologous pairs of sister chromosomes—one from the maternal and one from the paternal genome—then begin to align alongside each other lengthwise, matching corresponding DNA positions in a process...
Inductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...

