Revealing the Best Strategies for Rare Cell Type Detection in Multi-Sample Single-Cell Datasets
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Using R, Seurat, and CellChat to Analyze a Single-Cell Transcriptomics Dataset of Mouse Skin Wound Healing
Published on: August 1, 2025
Zhiwei Ye1,2, Yinqiao Yan3, Yuanyuan Yu4
1Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Abstract:
Background: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) enables high-resolution characterization of cellular heterogeneity and provides unique opportunities to identify rare cell populations that may be obscured in bulk transcriptomic data. However, despite the growing interest in rare-cell discovery, most existing detection methods were originally developed for single-sample datasets, and their behavior in multi-sample settings-where batch effects, sample imbalance, and heterogeneous cell-type compositions are common-remains poorly understood. This study aims to systematically evaluate representative rare cell detection methods under multi-sample settings and identify the most effective analytical strategies. Methods: We performed a comprehensive benchmarking analysis of five widely used rare cell detection tools, CellSIUS, GapClust, GiniClust, scCAD, SCISSORS and a scGPT-based rare cell detection method using Isolation Forest. Each method was evaluated under three analytical strategies: individual sample detection, pooled sample detection, and batch-corrected pooled sample detection. Performance was assessed across multiple publicly available scRNA-seq datasets using standardized evaluation metrics. Results: Batch-corrected pooled sample detection consistently achieved the highest overall performance across methods and datasets, whereas individual sample detection produced the weakest results. Among the evaluated tools, scCAD demonstrated the most robust and stable performance across dataset types and analytical conditions. Conclusions: This study provides strategy-level comparison in multi-sample settings. Our findings highlight the importance of batch correction and pooled analysis for improving rare cell detection accuracy and offer practical guidance for selecting optimal methods and analytical workflows in large-scale single-cell transcriptomic studies.
Related Concept Videos
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
Titrimetric Methods: Types and Commonly Used Strategies
T Cell Types and Functions
Th1 cells stimulate dendritic cells to express necessary co-stimulatory molecules on their surfaces for...
Connective Tissue Cell Types
Fat cells (adipocytes), smooth muscle cells (myoblasts), and bone cells (osteoblasts) are some connective tissue cell types. Some immune system cells...
Types of Receptors: Cell Surface Receptors
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

