Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Behavioral Inhibition Places Preschoolers at Risk for Reduced Social Competence, but Only in the Context of Other
Hailey Fleece1, Hedwig Teglasi1
1Department of Counseling, Higher Education, and Special Education, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Insights
Behavioral inhibition (BI) is not a uniform risk factor for social difficulties. Temperament traits, like anger and self-control, combined with BI, shape social competence in preschoolers. Understanding these constellations aids early intervention.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Child Psychiatry
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Behavioral inhibition (BI) is an early risk factor for developmental issues, potentially impacting peer interactions.
- Not all inhibited children face social challenges, suggesting other factors influence social competence.
- This study explored temperament heterogeneity within inhibited preschoolers to understand social functioning variability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine temperament trait heterogeneity in inhibited preschoolers using a person-centered approach.
- To identify how broader temperament traits contribute to variations in social functioning.
- To understand the interplay between BI and other temperamental traits in shaping social outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Latent Profile Analysis of parent-reported temperament (Children's Behavior Questionnaire) in 254 inhibited preschoolers.
- Used six temperament traits: anger, attentional focusing, inhibitory control, high-intensity pleasure, perceptual sensitivity, and approach.
- Examined profile differences in social competence (Social Skills Improvement System) controlling for age and gender.
Main Results:
- Identified three distinct profiles: Regulated, Unregulated and Angry, and Typical BI.
- Profile membership explained 37% of the variance in social skills.
- The Regulated group showed best social skills; the Unregulated and Angry group had the most difficulties. BI level did not differentiate profiles or predict social competence.
Conclusions:
- Behavioral inhibition (BI) is not a sole predictor of social outcomes; co-occurring temperament traits are crucial.
- Variability in social functioning among inhibited children is explained by specific temperamental constellations.
- Identifying these constellations can improve early identification and targeted interventions for socially at-risk inhibited children.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Behavioral inhibition (BI) has been extensively studied as an early-appearing risk factor for adverse developmental outcomes. One pathway through which BI may confer risk is via reduced competence to interact effectively with peers. Research demonstrating concurrent relations between BI and social competence supports this pathway, yet not all inhibited children experience social difficulties. This study adopted a person-centered approach to examine heterogeneity of temperament traits within a highly inhibited preschool sample and to identify how broader temperament traits contribute to variability in social functioning. Methods: Parents of preschoolers (N = 254) who met criteria for BI (≥85th percentile on the Behavioral Inhibition Questionnaire) completed measures of their child's temperament (Children's Behavior Questionnaire) and social competence (Social Skills Improvement System). Latent Profile Analysis was conducted using six temperament traits reflecting regulation and reactivity (anger, attentional focusing, inhibitory control, high-intensity pleasure, perceptual sensitivity, and approach). Profile differences in social competence were examined using multivariate analyses controlling for age and gender. Results: A three-profile solution emerged: Regulated, Unregulated and Angry, and Typical BI. Profile membership accounted for almost 37% of the variance in social skills scores. The Regulated group, marked by high attentional and inhibitory control and low anger, demonstrated the strongest social skills and lowest internalizing and externalizing problems. The Unregulated and Angry group, characterized by high anger and poor regulation, exhibited the greatest social difficulties. BI level itself did not significantly differentiate profiles or predict social competence. Conclusions: Findings underscore that BI is not a uniform risk factor but joins with other temperamental traits to shape social outcomes. Level of BI did not differentiate profiles or relate to social functioning, highlighting the importance of considering co-occurring regulatory and reactive traits to explain variability in outcomes among inhibited children. Identifying specific temperamental constellations may enhance early identification and inform targeted interventions for socially at-risk inhibited children.
Related Concept Videos
Trait and State Self-Esteem
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Social Scripts
Social Psychology and Individual Behavior
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

