Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Published on: September 28, 2019
Establishing a Robot-Assisted Liver Surgery Program: Early Experience from University Medical Center Ljubljana
Miha Petrič1,2, Živa Nardin2, Jan Grosek1,2
1Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Zaloska 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: Robot-assisted procedures represent a significant advancement in minimally invasive liver resection techniques. Nonetheless, the introduction of a novel surgical technique in a new environment necessitates meticulous planning and a gradual, stepwise approach. This study describes the adoption of a robotic surgical platform for liver resection at a high-volume tertiary care center. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data that had been prospectively collected from fifty robot-assisted liver resections. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, means/medians, and standard deviations, were employed for description and summary. Results: The median operative duration was 166 min (range: 85-400 min), with an average intraoperative blood loss of 200 mL (range: 50-1000 milliliters). Intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion was required in 8% of patients. Conversion to open resection was necessary in one patient (2%). The mean duration of hospitalization was 5 days (range: 3-20 days), with a 30-day readmission rate of 6% and no mortality within 90 days. Postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher were observed in five patients (10%). The mean tumor size varied according to pathology: 58.5 mm (range: 30-120 mm) in the hepatocellular carcinoma group; 27.4 mm (range: 10-32 mm) in the secondary malignancy group; and 42.6 mm (range: 24-60 mm) in the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma group. The median number of lymph nodes harvested during lymphadenectomy (IHHCA/GBCA) was 5.4, ranging from 1 to 11. The R0 resection rate for malignant tumors was 88.2% (of 30/34). Conclusions: This study validates the safe integration of robot-assisted surgery into liver disease treatment, supported by our initial experience. Despite its technical advantages, robotic-assisted liver surgery remains complex and demanding. Structured robotic training within established programs, meticulous patient selection, and a stepwise implementation approach are critical during the early phases to optimize the outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
Center of Gravity
Center of Gravity
To determine its location, the principle of moments can be utilized by dividing the object into...
Center of Mass
The knowledge of the center of mass can also help us to describe and predict the motion of objects. For example, when a ball is thrown...
Inhaled Medications
What is an Experiment?

