Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Cardiovascular Profile of Patients with Metabolic Syndrome
Published on: September 27, 2024
Quantification of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among Hypertensive Subjects in Active Romanian Population Using New
Calin Daniel Popa1, Rodica Dan1,2, Iosef Haidar1
1Saint Luca of Crimea Medical Centre, 041915 București, Romania.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of a novel software risk score, PulsIn, in predicting cardiovascular diseases within an independent study conducted on subjects from the western region of Romania. Accurate prediction of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients remains challenging when relying solely on traditional risk scores. This study proposes PulsIn, a composite risk score that integrates classical, echocardiographic, inflammatory, renal, and metabolic markers, combined with machine learning, to refine cardiovascular risk stratification. Materials and Methods: In a prospective cohort of 300 hypertensive adults without prior major cardiovascular events, we collected demographic and clinical data, standard risk factors, laboratory biomarkers (including homocysteine, paraoxonase-1 activity, microalbuminuria, and lipid profile), and advanced echocardiographic parameters (3D left ventricular ejection fraction, diastolic function, global longitudinal strain, and left atrial strain). PulsIn was constructed as an extended composite score and used as input to machine learning models (random forest, XGBoost, and other tree-based algorithms) to predict incident major cardiovascular events. Model performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curves, discrimination, calibration, and feature importance and compared with established risk scores (SCORE2, Framingham, QRISK, and others). Results: PulsIn-based models showed improved predictive performance compared with traditional scores, with XGBoost and random forest achieving area under the curve values up to approximately 0.85-0.88, versus 0.60-0.78 for conventional scores. Echocardiographic indices of subclinical cardiac damage, microalbuminuria, homocysteine, and paraoxonase-1 activity emerged as key predictors, particularly enhancing reclassification in patients at intermediate risk by traditional tools. Conclusions: The PulsIn composite risk score, integrating multimodal clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data within a machine learning framework, offers more accurate cardiovascular risk prediction than conventional algorithms in hypertensive patients. External validation in larger, independent, and more diverse populations is required before routine clinical implementation.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Conservation of Small Populations
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Population Growth
What is Conservation Biology?

