Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation
Published on: July 19, 2021
A systematic review of radiological outcomes and implant positioning in robotic-assisted functionally aligned robotic
Vasileios Giovanoulis1, Angelo V Vasiliadis2, Eleftherios Tsiridis3
1Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France - Third Academic Department of Orthopaedics, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki 56403, Greece - Orthopedic Surgery Department, Lyon Ortho Clinic, Clinique de la Sauvegarde, Lyon, France.
Introduction:
Functional alignment (FA) or functional knee positioning is a patient-specific strategy for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that utilizes robotics to balance coronal, sagittal, and axial planes while preserving joint-line orientation and soft-tissue tension within predefined guardrails. Although early clinical outcomes are encouraging, the radiographic profile and workflow consistency of robotic FA have not been clearly synthesized.
Methods:
In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, English-language studies of primary robotic FA-TKA with ≥2-year follow-up were searched. Eligible designs included RCTs, prospective/retrospective cohorts, and large case series (≥50 patients). Information on pre- and postoperative coronal alignment [hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA)], component positioning (femoral valgus/rotation/flexion; tibial varus/rotation/slope), and explicit FA workflow boundaries (guardrails) was extracted.
Results:
Twenty-one cohorts (5,360 knees) reported at least one radiographic or workflow endpoint. Preoperatively, the predominant deformity was varus. Postoperatively, limb alignment converged near neutral: HKA clustered around 178-179.5°, with LDFA ~89-91° and MPTA ~87-89°. Component positions were tightly distributed within FA targets: femoral valgus ≈ 0.5-1.5°, tibial varus ≈ ~3°, femoral flexion ~6-9°, and tibial slope ~0-3°; tibial rotation was overwhelmingly referenced to Akagi's line, and femoral rotation to the TEA in most series. Reported guardrails showed strong convergence: typical workflows included femoral valgus -3° to +6°, tibial varus 0-6°, tibial slope 0-3°, and femoral ER ~3-6° to TEA. Across cohorts, achieved radiographs closely tracked these limits, indicating high adherence and reproducibility. Most observational studies had a moderate risk of bias; the lone RCT was low risk.
Discussion:
Robotic FA-TKA delivers a radiographic profile with slight femoral valgus and modest tibial varus, while keeping components within narrow, pre-specified guardrails.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Knee Joint
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris...
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Random and Systematic Errors

