Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Wheel Running and Environmental Complexity as a Therapeutic Intervention in an Animal Model of FASD
Published on: February 2, 2017
Investigational sites requirements according to trial complexity and intervention level under EU Regulation No.
Celeste Cagnazzo1, Evaristo Maiello2, Roberto Labianca3
1Department of Pediatric Onco-Hematology Division, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
None:
The full implementation of Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014 has transformed the European clinical research landscape, introducing a harmonised, risk-based framework for trial approval and conduct. In Italy, however, the lack of nationally standardised site suitability criteria beyond phase I trials remains a critical regulatory gap, leading to procedural inconsistencies, delayed activations, and unequal patient access. This paper examines the shortcomings in European and Italian regulations and operations and suggests a tiered framework of minimum requirements for investigational centres. The model adjusts requirements based on trial complexity and associated risk, while ensuring compliance with EU legislation. This approach supports wider participation in pragmatic and late-phase oncology trials and prevents excessive centralisation in a few key hubs. It also emphasizes the need for formal recognition of essential research roles, such as study coordinators, data managers, and research pharmacists, critical to high-quality trials. By adopting this risk-adapted, scalable approach, national authorities could improve site qualification, streamline trial timelines, and enhance Italy's competitiveness in international oncology research. From a policy standpoint, establishing proportionate national standards is urgent to ensure equitable patient access, strengthen the resilience of the research system, and align with the inclusive and risk-oriented spirit of Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014. POLICY SUMMARY: Italy lacks nationally standardised site suitability criteria beyond phase I clinical trials, causing delays and inequities. This paper proposes a risk-based, proportionate framework of minimum requirements for investigational sites, aligned with Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014. Adoption by AIFA would provide consistent benchmarks for Ethics Committees and sponsors, improve trial activation, and expand equitable access to innovative therapies, while reinforcing Italy's role in multinational oncology research.
Related Concept Videos
Master Transcription Regulators
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
Positive Regulator Molecules
Regulated Protein Degradation
Protein degradation plays two important roles in the cells. It helps to protect cells from misfolded or damaged proteins before they lead to a...

