Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Application of End-to-end Anastomosis in Robotic Central Pancreatectomy
Published on: June 2, 2018
Robotic versus Open Pancreatectomy for Focal Congenital Hyperinsulinism in Infants: A Single-Center Study
Claire Dagorno1, Maxime Koffi1, Louise Galmiche2,3
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospitals, Paris, Île-de-France, France.
Insights
Robotic pancreatectomy shows promise for treating focal congenital hyperinsulinism (FoCHI) in children, offering comparable outcomes to open surgery. This approach enhances visualization, potentially improving resection and cure rates for this rare pediatric condition.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Endocrinology
Background:
- Focal congenital hyperinsulinism (FoCHI) is a rare pediatric endocrine disorder requiring surgical intervention.
- Established metabolic and surgical protocols exist for FoCHI management.
- The application of robotic surgery for pediatric pancreatectomy in FoCHI has not been previously documented.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present the initial experience with robotic pancreatectomy for focal congenital hyperinsulinism in children.
- To compare the outcomes of robotic pancreatectomy with the traditional open surgical approach for FoCHI.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective, single-center study included 25 children undergoing pancreatectomy for CHI between 2011 and 2024.
- Ten patients underwent robotic pancreatectomy using the Da Vinci Xi system; ten underwent open surgery.
- Data collected included demographics, surgical details, complications, and postoperative outcomes.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed between robotic and open groups in weight, age, operative time, length of stay, or time to feeding resumption.
- Intraoperative lesion visibility was 80% on the pancreatic surface. Incomplete resections occurred in two cases in each group.
- The overall cure rate was higher in the robotic group (90%) compared to the open surgery group (80%).
Conclusions:
- Robotic pancreatectomy appears to be a safe and feasible option for managing congenital hyperinsulinism in pediatric patients.
- The enhanced visualization provided by the robotic approach facilitates precise dissection and resection.
- Further research with larger sample sizes is necessary to validate these preliminary findings.
Objective:
Focal forms of congenital hyperinsulinism (FoCHI) are rare pediatric conditions managed using established metabolic and surgical protocols. To date, the use of a robotic approach for this surgery in children has not been described. We present our initial experience with robotic pancreatectomy, compared with the open approach, for the management of FoCHI.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective, single-center study involving 25 children who underwent pancreatectomy for CHI between 2011 and 2024. Collected data included patient demographics, surgical details, complications, and post-operative outcomes. The Da Vinci Xi robotic system was used for all robotic procedures.
Results:
Ten patients underwent robotic pancreatectomy, and 10 underwent open surgery; five children treated laparoscopically were excluded. There were no significant differences between the robotic and open groups in median weight at surgery (7.7 kg vs. 7.3 kg, p = 0.7), median age (7 months vs. 5.9 months, p = 0.48), median operative time (298 minutes vs. 285 minutes, p = 0.5), length of stay (14 days vs. 14.5 days, p = 0.26), or time to postoperative feeding resumption (4 days vs. 4.5 days, p = 0.68). Intraoperatively, 80% of lesions were visible on the pancreatic surface. Two cases of incomplete resection occurred in each group; after multidisciplinary review, both patients in the robotic group required a second procedure. No intraoperative bleeding or conversions were reported. The overall cure rate was 90% in the robotic group and 80% in the open surgery group.
Conclusion:
This preliminary study suggests that robotic pancreatectomy for congenital hyperinsulinism may be both safe and feasible. The robotic approach provides enhanced visualization of small vessels, enabling limited dissection and safe resection. Given the sample size, further studies are required to confirm these findings.
Related Concept Videos
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
Center of Gravity
Center of Gravity
To determine its location, the principle of moments can be utilized by dividing the object into...
Center of Mass
The knowledge of the center of mass can also help us to describe and predict the motion of objects. For example, when a ball is thrown...
Intracellular Signaling Affects Focal Adhesions
Some...
Instantaneous Center of Zero Velocity
To analyze this, consider two points on the wheel: point A and point B. The absolute velocity of point B can be expressed as the vector sum of the absolute velocity of point A and the relative velocity of point B with respect to point A. To simplify this analysis,...

