MRI-based deep learning model predicts recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in post-radiation nasopharyngeal necrosis
Chao Lin1, Jiong-Lin Liang2, Jia Guo2
1State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, PR China; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, PR China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, PR China.
Background:
The pretreatment identification of post-radiation nasopharyngeal necrosis (PRNN) combined with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (referred to as cancer-infiltrative PRNN) is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of PRNN. As the first study to identify recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in patients with PRNN, we aimed to develop a deep learning (DL)-based predictive model using routine MRI to distinguish cancer-infiltrative PRNN from cancer-free PRNN.
Methods:
MRIs of 437 patients with PRNN were manually labeled and randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Video Swin Transformer and Multilayer Perceptron were employed to construct the DL model. The integrated DL and clinical model (DCcombined model) and the integrated radiomics and clinical model (RCcombined model) were constructed using linear weighted fusion of the prediction results from the two models. The predictive value of each model was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
Results:
The DCcombined model significantly outperformed the radiologists in terms of AUC (0.83 vs. 0.60, p < 0.001), accuracy (0.78 vs. 0.60, p = 0.002), and sensitivity (0.86 vs. 0.62, p = 0.002) in the validation cohort. The DCcombined model showed the highest validation sensitivity of 0.86 (95 % CI 0.77-0.94), whereas the RCcombined model demonstrated the highest specificity of 0.88 (95 % CI 0.81-0.96).
Conclusions:
Our DCcombined model based on DL can noninvasively distinguish cancer-infiltrative PRNN from cancer-free PRNN with higher AUC, accuracy, and sensitivity than those of radiologists and better sensitivity than that of the RCcombined model based on radiomics.
More Related Videos
12:21Examining the Role of Nasopharyngeal-associated Lymphoreticular Tissue NALT in Mouse Responses to Vaccines
Published on: August 1, 2012
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required
Necrosis
Morphological Manifestations of Necrosis
Necrotic cells show different types of morphological appearance depending on the type of tissue and infection. In coagulative necrosis, cells become...
Biological Effects of Radiation
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Radiation: Applications
The average...
Absorption of Radiation
