Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Diffraction02:18

Interference and Diffraction

52.4K
Interference is a characteristic phenomenon exhibited by waves. When two electromagnetic waves interact with their peaks and troughs coinciding, a resulting wave with enhanced amplitude is produced. This is known as constructive interference. In this case, the two waves interacting are in phase with each other.
52.4K
RNA Interference01:23

RNA Interference

28.1K
RNA interference (RNAi) is a process in which a small non-coding RNA molecule blocks the post-transcriptional expression of a gene by binding to its messenger RNA (mRNA) and preventing the protein from being translated.
This process occurs naturally in cells, often through the activity of genomically-encoded microRNAs. Researchers can take advantage of this mechanism by introducing synthetic RNAs to deactivate specific genes for research or therapeutic purposes. For example, RNAi could be used...
28.1K
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

469
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
469
Sound Waves: Interference00:53

Sound Waves: Interference

4.7K
Sound waves can be modeled either as longitudinal waves, wherein the molecules of the medium oscillate around an equilibrium position, or as pressure waves. When two identical waves from the same source superimpose on each other, the combination of two crests or two troughs results in amplitude reinforcement known as constructive interference. If two identical waves, that are initially in phase, become out of phase because of different path lengths, the combination of crests with troughs...
4.7K
Interference and Superposition of Waves01:07

Interference and Superposition of Waves

6.9K
When two waves of the same nature occur in the same region simultaneously, they result in interference. Interference of waves implies that the net effect of the waves is the sum of the individual waves' effects. However, it does not imply that the individual waves affect the propagation of other waves.
Interference occurs in mechanical waves, such as sound waves, waves on a string, and surface water waves. Mechanical waves correspond to the physical displacement of particles. Hence,...
6.9K
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

2.2K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
2.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Silver bullets and sensory horizons.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Starting a revolution with a refuted model?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Novelty as a drive of human exploration in complex stochastic environments.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Failure to replicate a superiority effect in crowding.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Computational complexity as a potential limitation on brain-behaviour mapping.

The European journal of neuroscience·2025
Same author

Extracting medicinal chemistry intuition via preference machine learning.

Nature communications·2023
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Cross-Phoneme Generalisation of Dimension-Based Statistical Learning for Stop Voicing: Probing Subject Design and Word Frame Effects.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Improving 2D and 3D Skin In Vitro Models Using Macromolecular Crowding
09:14

Improving 2D and 3D Skin In Vitro Models Using Macromolecular Crowding

Published on: August 22, 2016

13.0K

How Are Grouping and Interference Related in Crowding?

Oh-Hyeon Choung1, Nadia Ruethemann1, Michael Herzog1

  • 1Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|February 1, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Visual crowding impairs perception with clutter. New research shows existing models of visual crowding, like feature pooling or substitution, fail to explain how flanking lines interfere with target perception.

Keywords:
Crowdinggrouping

More Related Videos

In Vitro Model of Human Cutaneous Hypertrophic Scarring using Macromolecular Crowding
08:20

In Vitro Model of Human Cutaneous Hypertrophic Scarring using Macromolecular Crowding

Published on: May 1, 2020

7.2K
Applying an Inducible Expression System to Study Interference of Bacterial Virulence Factors with Intracellular Signaling
08:51

Applying an Inducible Expression System to Study Interference of Bacterial Virulence Factors with Intracellular Signaling

Published on: June 25, 2015

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Improving 2D and 3D Skin In Vitro Models Using Macromolecular Crowding
09:14

Improving 2D and 3D Skin In Vitro Models Using Macromolecular Crowding

Published on: August 22, 2016

13.0K
In Vitro Model of Human Cutaneous Hypertrophic Scarring using Macromolecular Crowding
08:20

In Vitro Model of Human Cutaneous Hypertrophic Scarring using Macromolecular Crowding

Published on: May 1, 2020

7.2K
Applying an Inducible Expression System to Study Interference of Bacterial Virulence Factors with Intracellular Signaling
08:51

Applying an Inducible Expression System to Study Interference of Bacterial Virulence Factors with Intracellular Signaling

Published on: June 25, 2015

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Cognitive neuroscience
  • Experimental psychology

Background:

  • Visual crowding is a phenomenon where perception of an element degrades due to surrounding clutter.
  • The precise mechanisms causing this interference (e.g., feature pooling, lateral inhibition, substitution) remain debated.
  • Understanding crowding is crucial for visual processing and attention research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the underlying mechanisms of visual crowding.
  • To test the predictions of existing crowding models against empirical data.
  • To identify novel processes involved in visual interference.

Main Methods:

  • An array of lines with a central offset (vernier offset) was presented to observers.
  • Flanking lines were varied in orientation (straight, pro-vernier, anti-vernier) and proximity to the fovea.
  • Observer performance in reporting the central offset was measured.

Main Results:

  • A single pro-vernier flanker had minimal impact, contradicting pooling and substitution models.
  • Increasing pro-vernier flankers improved performance, while anti-verniers decreased it.
  • Flanker influence was greater closer to the fovea, challenging the in-out anisotropy typically observed.

Conclusions:

  • Existing models of visual crowding do not fully account for the observed interference patterns.
  • Novel mechanisms beyond feature pooling, inhibition, or substitution appear to be at play.
  • Further research is needed to develop comprehensive models of visual crowding.