Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Surgical Approach and Complications of Stand-alone Lateral Trans-Psoas Interbody Fusion
Published on: February 14, 2025
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using 3D Printed Implants and a Lateral Approach: Safety and Effectiveness
Douglas P Beall1, Ty Ptacek2, Ashley M Classen3
1Comprehensive Specialty Care, Interventional Pain/Interventional Radiology, Edmond, OK, USA.
Background:
Low back pain (LBP) is a widespread and costly condition. Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction accounts for 15-25% of chronic LBP cases and is especially common following lumbar spine fusion-affecting up to 75% of such patients within five years. Risk factors include prior spine surgery, pregnancy, obesity, trauma, and inflammatory diseases. For persistent cases, sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) is increasingly used, offering better outcomes than conservative treatments. Recent advancements in minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques and implant designs have improved the safety and effectiveness of SIJF, making it a reliable option for managing chronic SIJ dysfunction.
Objectives:
To examine the effectiveness of a minimally invasive sacroiliac joint approach and fusion device by means of clinical patient reported outcomes (PROs) and radiological outcomes.
Study Design:
The design of this clinical trial is a multi-site, prospective, single arm feasibility study.
Setting:
The study was conducted in 7 sites located across the United States including both private practices and academic centers from September 19, 2022, to December 6, 2023.
Methods:
This study enrolled 37 patients aged 21-80 with chronic SIJ pain or degenerative sacroiliitis unresponsive to conservative care. All underwent SIJF and were followed for six months. PROs on pain, function, opioid use, work status, adverse events, and quality of life were collected via email at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Diagnostic inclusion required SIJ pain localization, ? 3 of 6 positive physical exam tests, 75% pain relief after anesthetic injection, and confirmatory imaging. Exclusions included alternative causes of back pain, trauma, infection, or conditions that could interfere with recovery. Radiologic outcomes were evaluated by a six-month CT. PROs included pain reporting via the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), function via the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and quality of life via PROMIS-10.
Results:
The study measured outcomes using NRS, ODI, PROMIS-10, opioid use, pain interventions, work status, and SAEs. Pain scores (NRS) significantly decreased from 6.8 at baseline to 4.1, 4.8, and 4.2 at 1, 3, and 6 months (P < 0.01). Disability scores (ODI) also improved significantly from 50.3 to 41.7, 35.6, and 34.9 (P < 0.05). PROMIS-10 scores showed slight, non-significant improvements. Opioid use dropped from 26 to 13-16 patients over time, though not statistically significant. No SAEs occurred. CT scans at 6 months showed 96% implant bone apposition and no implant failures; 72% of patients had SIJ bridging.
Limitations:
This study is limited by a small sample size, short follow-up, and lack of control group.
Conclusions:
Laterally placed SIJ fusion titanium alloy implants are a safe and effective treatment for patients with refractory SIJ dysfunction, as evidenced by significant improvements in pain and function, high rates of radiological fusion, and a favorable safety profile.
Related Concept Videos
Nuclear Fusion
A helium nucleus has a mass that is 0.7% less than that of four hydrogen nuclei; this lost mass is converted into energy during the fusion. This reaction produces about...
Tagging and Fusion Proteins
SNAREs and Membrane Fusion
SNAREs exist in pairs that symmetrically interact and catalyze the fusion of the lipid bilayers in vesicle and target organelle. v-SNARE in the vesicle membrane are single polypeptide chains that bind to a complementary t-SNARE, composed of 2...
Fusion of Secretory Vesicles with the Plasma Membrane
In 1993, Jim Rothman proposed that the antiparallel pairing of vesicular and transmembrane SNAREs, or...
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

