Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Using SCOPE to Identify Potential Regulatory Motifs in Coregulated Genes
Published on: May 31, 2011
Involving community members in designing behavioural weight management programmes: a scoping review.
Theresa Hm Moore1,2, Rowan Brockman1,2, Rachel Perry1,2
1The National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Community involvement in developing Behavioural Weight Management Programmes (BWMPs) was high during planning but limited during delivery and evaluation. Improved reporting on community engagement is needed for better health program outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
- Community Engagement
Background:
- Community involvement in health program development enhances intervention effectiveness.
- Scoping review to understand community member contributions to Behavioural Weight Management Programmes (BWMPs).
- Explores various terms for community involvement like co-design and Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the stages of community involvement in BWMP development.
- To determine the level of community involvement (e.g., leading, collaborating).
- To provide examples of how community members participated.
Main Methods:
- Searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases (2010-2023).
- Two authors independently screened papers and extracted data on study characteristics, and stages, levels, and methods of community involvement.
- Included 58 BWMPs reported across 91 papers, primarily from the US.
Main Results:
- Community members initiated 36% of BWMPs, often adapting existing interventions (57%).
- Highest involvement was in planning (55% collaborators, 9% leaders); lower in delivery (33% collaborators, 16% leaders) and rare in evaluation (24% collaborators, 0% leaders).
- Adaptations included language, menus, format, activity, and personnel; cost and duration of involvement were poorly reported.
Conclusions:
- Substantial community leadership/collaboration in BWMP planning, but less in delivery and rarely in evaluation.
- Increased community involvement in evaluation is crucial for program relevance.
- Improved reporting on the costs and duration of community involvement is necessary for shared learning.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Managing Concrete Workability
The Scope of Physics
What are Populations and Communities?
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Group Design

