Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
Interference in Combined Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid Use: A Scoping Review
Augustina Noel1, Priyanka Jaisinghani2, Jithin Balan3,4
1Vinayaka Missions Research Foundation (DU), Puducherry, India.
Purpose:
Advancements in cochlear implant (CI) and hearing aid (HA) technology enabled the combining of acoustic and electric stimulation for bimodal hearing and electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS) among listeners with hearing loss. While some users experience benefits such as enhanced speech or music perception and improved localization, others face interference between CI and HA, potentially leading to HA discontinuation. Our study aims to explore the underlying causes of interference, map existing evidence, and identify potential research gaps. The insights gained on interference will help foresee and mitigate such scenarios, improving speech and music perception in bimodal and EAS users.
Method:
This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, and it was registered on protocols.io (access online at dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.dm6gp37xdvzp/v2). Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed articles written in English and published between 2000 and May 2024, and articles reported adverse performance outcomes with combined CI and HA use in adults or children compared to CI or HA alone. Relevant articles were searched using specific key words and Boolean operators across multiple databases.
Results:
The final scoping review included 15 articles published across 13 scientific journals. These articles originated from nine countries and underwent narrative analysis to extract insights on interference in combined CI and HA use.
Conclusions:
The study offers valuable insights into the prevalence, causes, and assessment of interference in the combined use of CI and HA. Our review suggests that bimodal interference is individualized or listener-specific, with various factors affecting the utility of bimodal and EAS. Thus, a mixed-methods approach should be implemented in the future to gain a more comprehensive understanding of interference. Customized strategies can also be explored and applied to reduce interference through HA programming, CI mapping, counseling, and training to enhance the benefits for bimodal and EAS users.
More Related Videos
03:49Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
Published on: October 11, 2024
07:00Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
Published on: June 21, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Hearing
The Scope of Physics
Interference and Diffraction
RNA Interference
This process occurs naturally in cells, often through the activity of genomically-encoded microRNAs. Researchers can take advantage of this mechanism by introducing synthetic RNAs to deactivate specific genes for research or therapeutic purposes. For example, RNAi could be used...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview