Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Ultrasound-Guided Orthotopic Implantation of Murine Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Published on: November 19, 2019
Outcome of Ultrasound-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Versus Cephalic Cutdown Permanent Pacemaker Implantation
Jiwan Pradhan1, Yusif Shakanti1, Victoria M Robinson2
1Cardiology, Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, Stockport, GBR.
Ultrasound-guided access for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation shows a lower complication rate and intermediate radiation exposure compared to traditional methods. Larger studies are needed to confirm its benefits in reducing complications and radiation burden.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Surgical Procedures
Background:
- Fluoroscopy with venogram is standard for central venous access in permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation.
- Ultrasound-guided access is promoted to reduce radiation, contrast, and injury, but its complication profile in PPM procedures is unclear.
- This study compares complications and radiation exposure for ultrasound-guided, fluoroscopy-guided, and cephalic vein cutdown access methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare access-related complications between ultrasound-guided, fluoroscopy-guided, and cephalic vein cutdown for PPM implantation.
- To analyze and compare radiation exposure across the three different central venous access methods.
- To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided access in PPM procedures.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cross-sectional study of 202 patients undergoing PPM implantation (August 2021-August 2022).
- Access methods included ultrasound-guided (n=56), fluoroscopy-guided (n=114), and cephalic cutdown (n=32).
- Access-related complications (arterial puncture, hematoma, pneumothorax, lead/device failure, procedure failure) and radiation dose were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Complication rates were 5.4% (ultrasound), 9.6% (fluoroscopy), and 9.4% (cephalic cutdown), with no statistically significant difference (p=0.62).
- Radiation dose varied significantly (p < 0.001), with median exposures: 10.1 mGy (cephalic), 13.4 mGy (ultrasound), and 19.2 mGy (fluoroscopy).
- Ultrasound-guided access demonstrated an intermediate radiation profile between cephalic cutdown and fluoroscopy-guided procedures.
Conclusions:
- Ultrasound-guided access showed the lowest complication rate, though not statistically significant, likely due to sample size.
- Radiation exposure was significantly lower with cephalic cutdown and ultrasound guidance compared to fluoroscopy.
- Findings support the safety of ultrasound-guided access for PPM implantation, warranting larger studies to confirm its role in reducing complications and radiation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cephalic Phase of Digestion
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Ultrasound I: Abdominal Ultrasonography
Abdominal ultrasonography, commonly known as abdominal ultrasound, is a vital, non-invasive medical imaging technique widely used in healthcare.
Procedure:
This diagnostic tool allows the clinician to visually inspect internal structures within the abdomen, including vital organs such as the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys, and spleen.
The abdominal ultrasound process begins with applying a special gel to the patient's skin over the abdomen. This gel enhances the...

