INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE OF PREMATURE NEWBORNS - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS

Kalina Trifonova1, Kiril Slaveykov1, Hristo Mumdzhiev2

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.

Acta Clinica Croatica
|February 4, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Intraocular pressure (IOP) in premature newborns is higher than in full-term infants, ranging from 10 to 29 mmHg. Central corneal thickness also decreases with maturation and correlates with IOP.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neonatology
  • Pediatrics

Background:

  • Intraocular pressure (IOP) in premature newborns differs significantly from full-term infants and adults.
  • Variations in IOP ranges are influenced by measurement techniques and analytical methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and analyze current literature on IOP values in premature newborns.
  • To establish typical IOP ranges and identify influencing factors in this population.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review.
  • Meta-analysis of existing studies on premature newborn IOP.
  • Analysis of factors affecting IOP measurements, including central corneal thickness.

Main Results:

  • Mean IOP in premature newborns ranges from 10 to 29 mmHg.
  • Premature newborns exhibit higher mean IOP compared to full-term newborns.
  • Central corneal thickness is a significant factor influencing IOP and declines with newborn maturation, showing a probable correlation with IOP.

Conclusions:

  • Premature newborns have distinct IOP ranges, generally higher than full-term infants.
  • Central corneal thickness is a key factor in IOP measurement variability and changes with infant development.
  • Further research with larger, well-defined cohorts is necessary to fully understand IOP dynamics in premature infants.

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.4K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.1K
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups01:09

Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups

Substituents on the benzene ring that direct an incoming electrophile to undergo substitution at the meta position are called meta directors. All meta directors either have a positive charge on the atom directly bonded to the ring or a partial positive charge. These groups function by withdrawing electrons from the ring through inductive and resonance effects. Consider the carbocation intermediates formed upon the addition of an electrophile on nitrobenzene at the...
6.0K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K