Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Cardiopulmonary Bypass in a Mouse Model: A Novel Approach
Published on: September 22, 2017
Optimising protamine dosing for heparin reversal after cardiopulmonary bypass: a population
Julien Lanoiselée1, Audrick Gibert2, Isabelle Gouin-Thibault3
1National Institute of Health and Medical Research, U1059, Vascular Dysfunction and Hemostasis, Saint-Étienne, France; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France.
Background:
Protamine is administered to reverse unfractionated heparin (UFH) after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), but dosing strategies-typically based on protamine-to-heparin (P:H) ratios-vary, and the minimal effective dose remains unclear. Reversal is commonly assessed using activated clotting time (ACT), which may not reliably reflect residual heparin activity. We used pharmacometric modeling to determine a minimal effective P:H ratio and to characterise the anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) activity-ACT relationship.
Methods:
In this prospective, single-centre study, 68 adults undergoing CPB-assisted cardiac surgery were enrolled. A total of 757 blood samples were collected intraoperatively and after UFH reversal to measure anti-Xa activity and ACT. A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was developed using a nonlinear mixed-effects approach to describe UFH neutralisation by protamine. This model was then used to perform Monte Carlo simulations estimating the probability of complete reversal (anti-Xa <0.10 IU ml-1) at various P:H ratios, based on cumulative intraoperative UFH dose.
Results:
Patients received a mean total dose of 30 250 IU UFH and 200 mg protamine i.v. Measured anti-Xa activity decreased to <0.10 IU ml-1 in all patients within 10 min of protamine initiation, indicating rapid reversal. Model-based simulations predicted that a P:H ratio of 0.625:1 would achieve complete reversal in 95% of patients. Although ACT and anti-Xa activity were positively associated, ACT values varied widely at low anti-Xa concentrations.
Conclusions:
A P:H ratio of 0.625:1 provided adequate UFH reversal. Given the imprecision of ACT, fixed low-ratio dosing without routine monitoring could be a practical alternative but requires prospective validation.
Clinical Trial Registration:
EudraCT (2019-000859-14); www.
Clinicaltrials:
gov (NCT04092868).
Related Concept Videos
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Dependence of Elimination Half-Life and Dose Clearance
A study on guinea pigs examined the...
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
Pharmacodynamics: Overview and Principles
Most drugs' effects result from their interactions with drug receptors or targets within the body. These interactions trigger specific responses at the cellular or systemic level. Drug receptors can be found on the surfaces of cells or...
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

