Related Experiment Video For Survival analysis
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Time to Follow-Up Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test with Centralized Patient Navigation: A
Anisha P Ganguly1,2, Meghan C O'Leary3,4, Seth D Crockett5
1Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Anisha_ganguly@med.unc.edu.
Background:
Patients in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) are at risk of delay in or non-completion of follow-up colonoscopy (FC) after a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Increased time to FC is associated with increased colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence, late-stage diagnosis, and mortality.
Objective:
We evaluated the impact of centralized patient navigation on completion of FC and time to FC after a positive FIT.
Design:
This survival analysis is a sub-analysis of a randomized clinical trial conducted in FQHC systems in North Carolina. Trial patients were randomly assigned to mailed FIT outreach and to centralized patient navigation for a positive FIT or to usual care alone.
Participants:
RCT participants with a positive FIT.
Intervention:
Intervention patients with a positive FIT were offered centralized telephone-based navigation to FC, including support with procedure scheduling, bowel preparation, and social needs. Patients in the control arm received usual care.
Main Measures:
We compared the restricted mean time to FC in an intention-to-screen survival analysis over 1 year of follow-up. We censored by last observation date when FC was not completed.
Key Results:
Among 4002 trial patients, 842 completed a FIT, of whom 89 (10.6%) tested positive and were included in this analysis. Forty-eight (53.9%) were female, 29 (32.6%) identified as Black, 53 (59.6%) identified as White, and 53 (59.6%) had no prior CRC screening. Fifty-eight (65.2%) were intervention patients, and 31 (34.8%) received usual care (control). Intervention patients were more likely to complete FC at 1 year than control patients (69.0% vs 38.7%, p = 0.006). The difference in mean time to FC between the arms was 80.4 days (95% CI 13.6-147.2, p = 0.018). As-screened sensitivity analyses showed that the difference in time to FC increased further with increasing levels of engagement with navigation.
Conclusions:
Centralized patient navigation significantly increased FC completion and reduced the mean time to FC after a positive FIT among FQHC patients. Patient navigation is an important intervention to support the timely diagnostic resolution of positive CRC screening in under-resourced settings.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04406714.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Trial and Error and Algorithm
The Central Dogma

