Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Gaze in Action: Head-mounted Eye Tracking of Children's Dynamic Visual Attention During Naturalistic Behavior
Published on: November 14, 2018
Quality of remotely-collected gaze data in autistic and nonspectrum children
Rhiannon Luyster1, Taylor Boyd2, Amelia Steele1
1Emerson College, Boston, MA.
Insights
Remote eye-gaze research is effective for studying autistic children and typically developing children. This study found remote data quality comparable to in-lab studies, supporting its use in developmental research.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Child Development
- Autism Research
Background:
- The shift towards remote research methods has accelerated in developmental science.
- Validating remote data collection is crucial for maintaining research rigor.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the quality of remote eye-gaze data collected via Zoom.
- To compare data quality between autistic children and language-matched nonspectrum children.
Main Methods:
- Utilized secondary data from 30 autistic and 30 nonspectrum children (mean ages 48 and 27 months).
- Children participated in an experimenter-moderated preferential looking paradigm remotely.
- Assessed co-occurring events, missing data rates, and inter-coder agreement for eye-gaze data.
Main Results:
- Co-occurring events were infrequent and did not differ between diagnostic groups.
- Missing data rates were low overall and not associated with diagnosis, age, or language level.
- Inter-coder agreement for eye-gaze data was comparable to traditional in-lab studies.
Conclusions:
- Remote, experimenter-moderated eye-gaze research is a viable and high-quality method.
- This approach is effective for studying both autistic and nonspectrum children remotely.
- Findings support the continued use of remote methodologies in developmental and autism research.
Abstract:
Many developmentalists have shifted to remote research. This project uses secondary data to evaluate the quality of eye-gaze data from 30 autistic children and a language-matched sample of 30 nonspectrum children (mean ages 48 and 27 months, respectively). All children completed an experimenter-moderated preferential looking paradigm via Zoom. Frequency of co-occurring child and household events, rates of missing data, and percent agreement between gaze coders were assessed. Results indicated that co-occurring events were minimal, with no diagnostic group differences. Missing data rates were low overall and were unrelated to diagnostic group, age, or language level of participants; however, higher rates of co-occurring child behaviors were associated with higher rates of missing data. Agreement between coders for eye gaze data was comparable to in-lab studies. Results affirm the usefulness of remote, experimenter-moderated gaze-based research with autistic and nonspectrum children.
Related Concept Videos
Data Collection II
Data Collection I
Data Collection by Experiments
An example of the experimental method is a public...
Data Collection by Survey
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...

