Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
Published on: March 29, 2022
Self-perceived far vision quality and night driving difficulties are not related to night myopia or visual acuity
Andrés Gené-Sampedro1,2, Javier Gene-Morales1,3, Francisco Alonso1
1INTRAS (Research Institute on Traffic and Road Safety), University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Abstract:
This study aimed to psychometrically validate the Night Drive Questionnaire (NDQ), a new tool designed to assess self-reported far vision quality and difficulties related to night driving. Additionally, we evaluated the questionnaire's potential for detecting and characterizing night myopia at an early stage. A total of 115 drivers, aged between 18 and 63 years (53% female), who regularly drove at night, completed the Night Drive Questionnaire (NDQ). Participants also had their refraction shift (night myopia) and visual acuity shift measured. Both refraction and visual acuity shift were calculated as the difference between the mesopic (low light) and photopic (normal light) measurements. We evaluated the 1) psychometric qualities through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and 2) concurrent validity through correlations (Spearman) between the NDQ factors and night myopia and standard visual acuity shift and comparisons (Welch) between age groups, sexes, and night myopia levels. The NDQ displayed the best psychometric properties with a four-factor adjusted model, which includes: F1 - Quality of Far Vision, F2 - Difficulties in perceiving with central vision, F3 - Difficulties in perceiving with peripheral vision, and F4 - Difficulties in perceiving with the interaction of central and peripheral vision. This model demonstrated acceptable validity, consistency, and reliability indexes. Males compared to females reported fewer difficulties perceiving with central and peripheral vision and the combination of both (all p ≤ 0.011). There were no significant differences in driving difficulties based on age (all p ≥ 0.252) or night myopia groups (all p ≥ 0.242). Additionally, there were non-significant correlations between the factors and either night myopia or visual acuity shift (all p ≥ 0.092). In summary, the results indicate that the NDQ is a valid and reliable tool for measuring self-reported quality of far vision and the visual-related difficulties experienced during night driving, whether related to central, peripheral, or mixed vision. However, it is not effective in detecting or characterizing night myopia. Future studies should assess whether the NDQ is valid for identifying other visual function parameters that are more directly linked to night driving challenges.
More Related Videos
06:25Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
Published on: February 23, 2024
06:16An Experimental Approach to Investigating Effects of Artificial Light at Night on Free-Ranging Animals: Implementation, Results, and Directions for Future Research
Published on: February 2, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Nightmares and Night Terrors
Nightmares...
Restless Leg Syndrome and Night Terrors
The exact cause of RLS is not fully understood, but it is believed to involve dopamine, a neurotransmitter that helps regulate muscle movement. Imbalances in dopamine levels...
Vision
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
Color Vision
Energy to Drive Translocation
Generally, polypeptides are unfolded by two distinct...