Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
Published on: April 17, 2012
Gynecological cancer patients share insights for better shared decision-making
Kasper Frank1, Karina Dahl Steffensen1, Lea Lund2
1Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Objectives:
To examine gynecological cancer patients' preferred role in decision making, their experienced involvement, and their advice to patients and clinicians on preparing for and supporting SDM in clinical consultations.
Methods:
Two validated questionnaires, the Control Preference Scale (CPS) and CollaboRATE, were used to assess patients' preferred roles in SDM and their perceived level of involvement in medical decisions. Two open-ended questions were included to gather descriptive advice from patients, intended for both patients and clinicians. The sample for this survey was drawn from participants in a Danish patient advocacy group.
Results:
In total, 117 patients completed the CPS, with 90% (n = 105) indicating a preference for an active role and 10% (n = 12) indicating a preference for a collaborative role in decision making. Mean item scores for CollaboRATE (n = 114) were 6.6 (SD = 2.1) for explanation, 5.2 (SD = 2.6) for preference elicitation, and 5.5 (SD = 2.5) for integration, with 7.9% of the respondents giving a top score. The most repeated theme of advice to patients was to ask questions. Empathic communication, including active listening and the provision of clear, easy-to-understand information, was the most frequently emphasized advice to clinicians.
Conclusions:
Patients with gynecological cancer express a strong desire for involvement in SDM; however, many report that their experienced level of participation falls short of their preferences. They recommend an active role by asking targeted questions, thoroughly understanding benefits and risks of options, and remaining persistent in expressing needs. Patients emphasized the importance of empathetic communication, active listening, and the provision of clear, easy-to-understand information by clinicians.
Practical Implications:
Our findings offer actionable recommendations to bridge the gap between patients' preferred role in SDM and their actual experiences across the care journey. By incorporating these recommendations, both patients and clinicians can adopt practical strategies to facilitate more personalized, patient-centered decisions aligned with individual preferences and needs.
Related Concept Videos
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Groupthink
Cancer

