Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments
Published on: March 28, 2018
Extreme value analysis has the potential to improve spirometry interpretation
Brian L Graham1, Sanja Stanojevic2
1Respiratory Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada brian.graham@usask.ca.
Lung function impairment may not follow a typical Gaussian distribution. Extreme value analysis using a Gumbel distribution offers a more objective way to differentiate healthy versus impaired lung function.
Area of Science:
- Pulmonary Medicine
- Biostatistics
- Respiratory Physiology
Background:
- Spirometry is crucial for diagnosing and managing respiratory diseases.
- Interpretation often assumes healthy lung function follows a Gaussian distribution.
- This assumption may not accurately reflect impaired lung function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if lung function impairment follows a non-Gaussian distribution.
- To apply extreme value analysis for modeling impaired lung function.
- To develop a more objective method for interpreting spirometry results.
Main Methods:
- Hypothesized non-Gaussian distribution for impaired lung function.
- Utilized Gumbel distribution to model lung function impairment.
- Calculated relative probability comparing healthy (Gaussian) and impaired (Gumbel) distributions.
Main Results:
- Demonstrated the utility of relative probability in simulated cases.
- Provided objective delineation of the uncertainty zone between normal and impaired function.
- Showcased a more analytic assessment of lung function impairment.
Conclusions:
- Treating impaired lung function as a separate distribution improves assessment.
- Extreme value analysis and relative probability offer objective discrimination.
- A more precise definition of the uncertainty zone enhances interpretation accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Interpreting R Charts
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
Absolute and Local Extreme Values
Interpreting Run Charts
Mass Spectrum: Interpretation
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Interpreting X̄ Charts
An x̄ chart plots the values of individual measurements over time against control limits calculated from historical data. The central line...

