Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Motion Of A Charged Particle In A Magnetic Field01:22

Motion Of A Charged Particle In A Magnetic Field

7.1K
A charged particle experiences a force when moving through a magnetic field. Consider the field to be uniform and the charged particle to move perpendicular to it. If the field is in a vacuum, the magnetic field is the dominant factor determining the motion. Since the magnetic force is perpendicular to the direction of motion, a charged particle follows a curved path. The particle continues to follow this curved path until it forms a complete circle. Another way to look at this is that the...
7.1K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.7K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.7K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.5K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.5K
Equation of Motion: General Plane motion01:22

Equation of Motion: General Plane motion

585
In the context of a rigid body's movement within a general plane, it is important to understand that this motion is typically triggered by external forces or couple moments exerted onto it. This principle can be explained through Newton's second law, which stipulates the translational motion of the body's center of mass along each axis.
Moreover, the body's center of mass experiences a rotational effect as a result of these couple moments. This rotation can be articulated as the...
585
G-protein Coupled Receptors01:21

G-protein Coupled Receptors

132.1K
G-protein coupled receptors are ligand binding receptors that indirectly affect changes in the cell. The actual receptor is a single polypeptide that transverses the cell membrane seven times creating intracellular and extracellular loops. The extracellular loops create a ligand specific pocket which binds to neurotransmitters or hormones. The intracellular loops holds onto the G-protein.
132.1K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.5K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Daring few, patient many: Division of labor in decentralized foraging collectives.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Information-seeking decision strategies mitigate risk in dynamic, uncertain environments.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026
Same author

Information-Seeking Decision Strategies Mitigate Risk in Dynamic, Uncertain Environments.

ArXiv·2025
Same author

Untangling dopamine and glutamate in the ventral tegmental area.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

MULTISCALE MOTION AND DEFORMATION OF BUMPS IN STOCHASTIC NEURAL FIELDS WITH DYNAMIC CONNECTIVITY.

Multiscale modeling & simulation : a SIAM interdisciplinary journal·2025
Same author

Impact of correlated information on pioneering decisions.

Physical review research·2025
Same journal

Poisoning the Genome: Targeted Backdoor Attacks on DNA Foundation Models.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Mechanistic mathematical model of the in vitro infection dynamics of Bunyamwera and Batai viruses including MOI-dependent shortening of the eclipse phase.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

AI-Driven Lumped-Element Modeling of Human Respiratory System for Studying Voice Mechanics.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Beyond Algorithms: Conceptual Innovation in Medical Imaging AI.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Feynman Kac Reweighted Schrödinger Bridge Matching for Surface-Based Tau PET Harmonization.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Agentic Discovery of Non-Canonical Antimicrobial Peptides with AMPGAN v3.

ArXiv·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.2K

Stroboscopic motion reversals in delay-coupled neural fields.

Noah Parks, Zachary P Kilpatrick

    Arxiv
    |February 6, 2026
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Neural delays create discrete speed states in visual processing, explaining illusions like the wagon-wheel effect. This dynamical neural model reveals how signal timing shapes perception.

    More Related Videos

    A Field Primer for Monitoring Benthic Ecosystems Using Structure-From-Motion Photogrammetry
    06:36

    A Field Primer for Monitoring Benthic Ecosystems Using Structure-From-Motion Photogrammetry

    Published on: April 15, 2021

    4.2K
    Electric Field-controlled Directed Migration of Neural Progenitor Cells in 2D and 3D Environments
    11:15

    Electric Field-controlled Directed Migration of Neural Progenitor Cells in 2D and 3D Environments

    Published on: February 16, 2012

    12.2K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Feb 7, 2026

    Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
    06:25

    Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

    Published on: February 23, 2024

    1.2K
    A Field Primer for Monitoring Benthic Ecosystems Using Structure-From-Motion Photogrammetry
    06:36

    A Field Primer for Monitoring Benthic Ecosystems Using Structure-From-Motion Photogrammetry

    Published on: April 15, 2021

    4.2K
    Electric Field-controlled Directed Migration of Neural Progenitor Cells in 2D and 3D Environments
    11:15

    Electric Field-controlled Directed Migration of Neural Progenitor Cells in 2D and 3D Environments

    Published on: February 16, 2012

    12.2K

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Computational Neuroscience
    • Visual Perception

    Background:

    • Visual illusions offer insights into visual processing mechanisms.
    • Dynamical neural circuit models are valuable for testing theories of perceptual phenomena.
    • Activity propagation delays are crucial in shaping visual percepts.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose and analyze a delay-coupled neural field model explaining stroboscopic percepts.
    • To investigate how neural delays influence the emergence of visual illusions like the wagon-wheel effect.
    • To understand the role of uniform and spatially dependent delays in neural signal transmission.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed a delay-coupled neural field model with ring-organized neurons encoding angular preference.
    • Analyzed models with instantaneous local and delayed long-range neural coupling.
    • Employed interface-based asymptotic methods to reduce neural field dynamics to coupled delay differential equations.

    Main Results:

    • Demonstrated that neural delays generate coexisting traveling bump solutions with distinct, quantized propagation speeds.
    • Showcased how regularly pulsed inputs induce transitions between discrete speed states, including reversed motion.
    • Captured key features of visual aliasing and stroboscopic motion reversal.

    Conclusions:

    • Delayed neural interactions organize perception into discrete dynamical states.
    • Provided a mechanistic explanation for stroboscopic visual illusions based on neural signal propagation delays.
    • Highlighted the significance of delays in neural fields for understanding visual perception and illusions.