Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
Published on: December 15, 2023
Novel artificial intelligence-enabled deep learning system to enhance adenoma detection: a prospective randomized
Jesse Lachter1, Simon Christopher Schlachter2, Robert Scooter Plowman2,3
1Elisha Hospital, Haifa, Israel.
Background And Aims:
Several artificial intelligence (AI) systems for polyp detection during colonoscopy have emerged in the gastroenterology literature and continue to demonstrate significant improvements in quality outcomes. This study assesses clinical quality outcomes during white-light colonoscopy with and without a novel AI computer-aided detection system, DEtection of Elusive Polyps (DEEP2), using Fuji 7000 series colonoscopes (Fujifilm, Singapore).
Methods:
An unblinded, randomized (1:1), controlled, prospective study was performed at a single ambulatory care endoscopy center under institutional review board approval. Included participants ages 40 to 85 years were scheduled to undergo colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, or symptoms. Exclusion criteria were inflammatory bowel disease, prior colorectal surgery, known polyp referral, pregnancy, inadequate bowel prep, and incomplete colonoscopies. DEEP2 was trained and validated only on white-light imaging, excluding the use of continuous digital chromoendoscopy.
Results:
Mean patient age was 62.4 years (SD, 10.29), and 49% were men. Of 674 colonoscopies analyzed, significant differences were found in the adenoma detection rate (ADR) between the 2 arms of the study, those performed without versus with DEEP2 (10% vs 27%-37%, respectively; P = .0057). Significant differences were also found for adenomas per colonoscopy (APCs; .62 vs .39, respectively; P < .001) and polyp detection rate (17% vs 39%-56%, respectively; P < .001). In the right-sided colon, where most interval cancers are found, it also showed significant ADR and APC differences (P < .01). The false alert rate (mean, 4 per examination) was lower than the mean of >20 false alerts reported for other computer-aided detection systems. Withdrawal times were equivalent between arms (mean, 7.2 minutes; not significant).
Conclusions:
Seven enrolled physicians and 5 participating nurses reported a unanimous desire to continue using DEEP2 after the completion of the study and after commercial availability. (Clinical trial registration number: MYTRIALS.).
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Intelligence
Random Error
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...

