Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
Published on: February 17, 2023
Performance of single-use duodenoscopes for ERCP: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Harishankar Gopakumar1, Ishaan Vohra1, Neil R Sharma2
1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, Illinois, USA.
Background And Aims:
Transmission of exogenous pathogens during ERCP because of contaminated duodenoscopes has been an emerging problem worldwide. Single-use duodenoscopes (SUDs) have been proposed as a viable alternative to mitigate this risk. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the performance characteristics, safety profile, and overall endoscopist satisfaction with the use of SUDs for ERCP.
Methods:
Electronic databases from 2014 through September 2022 were searched for publications addressing performance characteristics, safety profile, and overall endoscopist impression of SUDs for ERCPs. Pooled proportions were calculated using both fixed- and random-effects models.
Results:
Five studies comprising 420 patients were included. In these patients, 43.00% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.32-47.75) had previous biliary or pancreatic sphincterotomy. In the pooled analysis, the ERCP completion rate with SUDs was 92.32% (95% CI, 89.60-94.67). The pooled crossover rate from SUDs to reusable duodenoscopes was 7.45% (95% CI, 5.15-10.15). After crossover, 61.85% (95% CI, 44.78-77.53) of the failed ERCPs were completed using a conventional duodenoscope. The pooled overall completion rate was 96.25% (95% CI, 93.61-98.21). The pooled estimate of endoscopist satisfaction score with SUDs was 8.32 (95% CI, 7.46-9.18) on a Likert scale of 1 to 10. Individual ERCP maneuvers were also rated on a Likert scale of 1 to 5. Overall, 29.88% of procedures (95% CI, 25.62-34.33) were grade 3 and 9.37% (95% CI, 6.78-12.34) were grade 4 according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy grade for complexity. Adverse event rates were calculated.
Conclusions:
Our analysis showed that SUDs deliver consistent performance across a wide range of ERCP procedures with an excellent safety profile. Although SUDs are an exciting alternative to reduce the risk of exogenous duodenoscope-related infections, further robust research is needed to clarify the most appropriate indications for their use.
More Related Videos
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
06:26Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
Published on: November 27, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Random and Systematic Errors
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...