Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
Published on: December 15, 2023
Performance of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Software for Automated Kellgren-Lawrence Grading of Knee
Byung Sun Choi1, Sung Hwan Hong2, Han-Jun Lee3
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Background:
The Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system is the standard for assessing knee osteoarthritis (OA) severity. However, it is limited by major observer variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) may standardize grading, yet external validation is limited. This study evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of AI-based software on a large, independent, multicenter clinical dataset.
Methods:
This multicenter, retrospective, pivotal study included 2,546 knee radiographs from 1,273 patients across two tertiary hospitals in Korea. A reference standard was established by an expert consensus panel, with KL grades 0 and 1 consolidated into a single KL ≤ 1 category. The AI software was trained exclusively on public United States datasets (Osteoarthritis Initiative and the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study) and validated on this separate Korean dataset. The primary outcomes were grade-specific sensitivity and specificity for four categories (≤ 1, 2, 3, and 4). The secondary outcomes included accuracy, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, and binary diagnostic performance for radiographic OA (KL ≥ 2).
Results:
The AI met all prespecified noninferiority endpoints. For KL ≤ 1, sensitivity was 90.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 87.9 to 92.8) and specificity was 96.6% (95% CI, 95.0 to 97.9). For KL grade 4, sensitivity was 97.7% (95% CI, 97.5 to 99.1), and specificity was 98.4% (95% CI, 97.5 to 99.1). For KL grade 2, sensitivity was 77.2% and specificity was 95.3%. In the binary classification of radiographic OA, the AI achieved an area under the curve of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92 to 0.96), sensitivity of 96.6%, specificity of 90.5%, and accuracy of 94.2%.
Conclusions:
In a large-scale, multicenter external validation using a dataset entirely independent of its training data, the AI-based software demonstrated high and robust diagnostic performance for KL grading. These findings support the software's potential for clinical integration to improve the consistency, objectivity, and efficiency of knee OA severity assessment.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III.
Related Concept Videos
Intelligence
Knee Joint
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris...
Graded Potential
Graded potentials fall into two categories: depolarizing and hyperpolarizing. Depolarizing graded potentials typically occur when sodium (Na+) or...
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Types of Aggregate Grading
Well-graded aggregates include a complete range of necessary size fractions that fit together to create a dense matrix with minimal voids, represented by a smooth, continuous gradation curve. This type of grading ensures good...
Multiple Intelligences Theory

