Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

How to Build a Vacuum Spring-transport Package for Spinning Rotor Gauges
Published on: April 7, 2016
First-principles investigation of spin-dependent thermoelectric transport and spin Seebeck in Fe(110)/Co([Formula:
Pirapat Waritkraikul1, Annop Ektarawong2,3, Wutthikrai Busayaporn4
1Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Thammasat School of Engineering,Thammasat University, Rangsit Campus, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Abstract:
We compute spin-dependent thermoelectric properties of Fe(110)/Co([Formula: see text]) thin films using spin-polarized density functional theory combined with semiclassical Boltzmann transport. The spin-resolved Seebeck coefficients [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] remain negative and metallic, with magnitudes of a few tens of [Formula: see text] between 0 and 500 K and only weak sensitivity to small rigid-band dopings. Because the transport formalism yields [Formula: see text], we estimate the relaxation time using two complementary models, namely an acoustic-phonon-limited deformation-potential approach and an empirical metallic lifetime inferred from the Seebeck coefficient. The former gives sub-picosecond to picosecond lifetimes, while the latter yields shorter lifetimes of a few tens to a few hundred femtoseconds. The resulting conductivities fall in a realistic thin-film range and show clear in-plane anisotropy with [Formula: see text], reflecting anisotropic band velocities and effective masses. Within a two-current description, the spin Seebeck coefficient [Formula: see text] reaches a few [Formula: see text] with deformation-potential lifetimes but is reduced to a directional average of about [Formula: see text] at 300 K when empirical lifetimes are used. These values provide a baseline estimate of the effective electronic contribution within the two-current framework for all-ferromagnet Fe/Co stacks.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin
Atomic nuclei have a net nuclear spin, , which can have an integer or half-integer value. In atomic nuclei, the spins of protons are paired against each other but not with neutrons, and vice versa. Consequently, an even number of protons does not contribute to...
![Measuring the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Magnetic Field Dependence of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F59399.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
