Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction vs Nonoperative Treatment for Recurrent Lateral Patellar Dislocation:
Truls Martin Straume-Næsheim1,2, Per-Henrik Randsborg1, Tina Løkken Nilsgård3
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Background:
Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) is the primary surgical intervention for recurrent lateral patellar dislocation (LPD). Isolated MPFL-R is recommended for patients without anatomic high-risk factors that predispose to further dislocations.
Purpose:
To compare instability recurrence in patients with recurrent LPD without underlying anatomic risk factors treated with MPFL-R versus active rehabilitation.
Study Design:
Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Methods:
Patients aged 12 to 30 years with recurrent LPD and no underlying anatomic high-risk factors for further dislocations-specifically, no severe trochlear dysplasia (Dejour D) and a tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance ≤20 mm on computed tomography-were randomized to receive knee arthroscopy with isolated MPFL-R followed by active rehabilitation (MPFL group) or knee arthroscopy without reconstruction followed by active rehabilitation (control group). The primary outcome was subjective persistent patellar instability at 3 years. Knee function at baseline and 1 and 3 years was assessed by the following patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Kujala Knee Score, Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Noyes Sports Activity Rating Scale.
Results:
Between 2010 and 2019, 61 patients (72.1% female) were included in the study and randomized, with 30 assigned to the MPFL group and 31 to the control group. At 3-year follow-up, subjective persistent patellar instability was reported by 5 patients in the MPFL group (16.7%) versus 15 patients in the control group (53.6%), corresponding to an odds ratio of 5.8 (95% CI, 1.7-19.4; P = .003). Both groups reported significant improvements in all PROM scores from baseline to 3 years. However, no significant differences in PROM scores were observed between the groups at any follow-up time point.
Conclusion:
Isolated MPFL-R was more effective than active rehabilitation alone in preventing patellar instability after 3 years.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.org (NCT02263807).
Related Concept Videos
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Random Error
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...

