Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

10:52
Direct Imaging of Laser-driven Ultrafast Molecular Rotation
Published on: February 4, 2017
10.2K
Asymmetric Spin Canting and Demagnetization Dynamics Driven by Laser Fields in Two-Dimensional Altermagnets.
Shuo Li1, Ran Wang1, Thomas Frauenheim1,2
1Institute for Advanced Study, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China.
Nano Letters
|February 9, 2026
Summary
Researchers explored ultrafast magnetization dynamics in 2D altermagnets (AMs). Laser pulses induced asymmetric demagnetization in Fe2WTe4, creating a photoinduced ferrimagnetic state tunable by laser polarization.
Area of Science:
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Materials Science
- Ultrafast Phenomena
Background:
- Ultrafast magnetization dynamics are understood in conventional magnets.
- Altermagnets (AMs) present a new frontier for exploring light-matter interactions.
- The behavior of 2D semiconducting AMs under laser excitation is largely unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate laser-induced ultrafast magnetization dynamics in 2D altermagnets.
- Explore the potential for light-driven control of magnetism in these materials.
- Uncover the microscopic mechanisms behind laser-induced spin dynamics in Fe2WTe4.
Main Methods:
- Employed real-time time-dependent density functional theory (rt-TDDFT).
- Simulated the interaction of laser pulses with a 2D semiconducting altermagnet (Fe2WTe4).
- Analyzed sublattice-resolved demagnetization and spin dynamics.
Main Results:
- Demonstrated asymmetric demagnetization between Fe sublattices in Fe2WTe4.
- Achieved a photoinduced ferrimagnetic state with a net magnetization of ~0.3 μB per unit cell.
- Observed tunable, non-collinear spin dynamics and spin canting controlled by laser polarization.
Conclusions:
- Laser pulses can induce unique ultrafast magnetization dynamics in 2D AMs.
- Momentum-dependent spin-splitting and optical intersite spin transfer effect (OISTR) drive these dynamics.
- Light offers a pathway for controlling spin textures and achieving novel magnetic states in 2D AMs.
Related Concept Videos
Rotation of Asymmetric Top
1.6K
By definition, a spherically symmetric body has the same moment of inertia about any axis passing through its center of mass. This situation changes if there is no spherical symmetry. Since most rigid bodies are not spherically symmetric, these require special treatment.
The relationship between the angular momentum of any rigid body and its angular velocity, both of which are vectors, involves the moment of inertia. The moment of inertia is a scalar quantity only for spherically symmetric...
The relationship between the angular momentum of any rigid body and its angular velocity, both of which are vectors, involves the moment of inertia. The moment of inertia is a scalar quantity only for spherically symmetric...
1.6K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
3.3K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.3K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
1.5K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.5K
Asymmetric Lipid Bilayer
9.9K
Biological membranes show uneven distribution of different types of lipids in the inner and outer layers, resulting in transverse asymmetric membranes. The treatment of the erythrocyte membrane with the enzyme phospholipase confirmed the asymmetric nature of the lipid bilayer. The enzyme hydrolyzes lipids into fatty acids and hydrophilic groups. The phospholipase acts only on the outer layer of the membrane, while the inner layer remains intact. The phospholipase treatment resulted in 80%...
9.9K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
1.7K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.7K

