Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

08:33
Induction and Assessment of Exertional Skeletal Muscle Damage in Humans
Published on: December 11, 2016
7.9K
Effort norms encourage more exertion but not less
Emily Zohar1, Michael Inzlicht1
1Department of Psychology, University of Toronto.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|February 9, 2026
Summary
People generally prefer less effort, but social norms significantly influence choices. This study found people increase effort to match high-effort norms but resist low-effort norms, showing a resistance to reducing effort.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- The law of least effort suggests individuals prefer minimal exertion for rewards.
- Previous research often overlooks social influences on effort, despite humans being social beings shaped by group norms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether individuals conform equally to high-effort and low-effort social norms.
- To determine if the direction of a norm (high vs. low effort) affects its influence on behavior.
Main Methods:
- 12 studies involving 1,957 participants completing a demand selection task.
- Participants repeatedly chose between a difficult or easy task.
- Experimental manipulation involved informing participants about the choices of previous participants.
Main Results:
- Participants exerted significantly more effort when informed that others chose the harder task.
- When informed that others chose the easier task, participants did not reduce effort and even increased it.
- Effort levels remained unchanged compared to a control group, even when low effort was made more appealing.
Conclusions:
- Individuals readily conform to high-effort norms but resist conforming to low-effort norms.
- Social influence can inspire increased effort, but there is a strong resistance to decreasing effort below typical levels.
- Normative influence on effort is specific to the task, suggesting context-dependent effects.
Related Concept Videos
Social Loafing
39.7K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.7K
Social Scripts
10.3K
People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter),...
10.3K
Robbers Cave
14.9K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.9K
Conformity
48.2K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
48.2K
Definition and Measurement of Pressure: Atmospheric Pressure, Barometer, and Manometer
43.6K
Gas pressure is caused by force exerted by gas molecules colliding with the surfaces of objects. Although the force of each collision is very small, any surface of an appreciable area experiences a large number of collisions in a short time, which can result in high pressure.
43.6K
Global Climate Change
29.0K
Throughout its ~4.5 billion year history, the Earth has experienced periods of warming and cooling. However, the current drastic increase in global temperatures is well outside of the Earth’s cyclic norms, and evidence for human-caused global climate change is compelling. Paleoclimatology, the study of ancient climate conditions, provides ample evidence for human-caused global climate change by comparing recent conditions with those in the past.
29.0K

