Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Myocardial Infarction by Percutaneous Embolization Coil Deployment in a Swine Model
Published on: November 4, 2021
Comparing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mortality after Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and
Seyedhesamoddin Khatami1, Mohammadsadegh Faghihi2, Parsa Irajian2
1Emergency Care Promotion Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Introduction:
Accurate prediction of mortality following myocardial infarction (MI) is critical for timely identification of high-risk patients and optimization of interventions. Conventional statistical models are commonly used; however, advanced machine learning (ML) methods are being increasingly recognized. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate and compare the predictive performances of various ML models.
Methods:
A systematic search of the Medline (via PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted up to January 9, 2025. A total of 14933 articles were identified, of which 330 underwent a full-text review and 69 met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis was conducted using a bivariate random-effects model in the 'midas' package of STATA 14. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the follow-up duration and selected clinical features. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUAPAS. Publication bias and evidence certainty were assessed using Deeks' funnel plots and GRADE framework, respectively.
Results:
Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), Single Decision Tree Models, and Random Forest models yielded similarly high predictive accuracies. Advanced GBMs, particularly XGBoost (AUC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.87-0.92; sensitivity = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.74-0.82; specificity = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.83-0.89), showed the highest evidence certainty due to precision and minimal publication bias. Across advanced GBMs, adding echocardiographic parameters increased the sensitivity from 0.77 to 0.83 and specificity from 0.85 to 0.90, indicating a clinically meaningful yet resource-dependent gain in discrimination.
Conclusions:
Advanced Gradient Boosting Machines, particularly XGBoost, currently provide the most reliable mortality predictions in patients with MI. Future research should emphasize external validation, transparent reporting of feature selection, detailed data preprocessing, and dedicated studies on populations with NSTEMI.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Simplified Synchronous Machine Model
In this model, each generator is connected to a...
Wind Turbine Machine Models
Induction machines interact through the rotating magnetic field generated by the stator and the rotor. The key parameter is slip, which is the difference between synchronous speed and rotor speed relative to synchronous speed. Slip is...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Predicting Molecular Geometry

