Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Robotic Myotomy and Partial Fundoplication for Achalasia
Published on: August 11, 2023
Achalasia: Physician Practices and Knowledge in Türkiye
Ayça Eroğlu Haktanır1, Altay Çelebi1
1Department of Gastroenterology, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Physician knowledge and diagnostic practices for achalasia vary significantly by gender, specialty, and hospital type in Türkiye, leading to diagnostic delays. Improving education and access to high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) is crucial for earlier achalasia diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Esophageal Motility Disorders
Background:
- Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder often underrecognized due to nonspecific symptoms and limited physician awareness.
- Diagnostic delays for achalasia are common despite advancements in diagnostic tools.
- Previous studies in Türkiye were primarily single-center or review-based, lacking a nationwide assessment of physician-related factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate physician knowledge, diagnostic practices, and access to high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM).
- To identify factors influencing diagnostic delay for achalasia nationwide in Türkiye.
- To provide the first nationwide dataset on achalasia-focused physician practices.
Main Methods:
- A web-based survey was distributed to 4216 physicians, with 675 responses analyzed (16.0% response rate).
- The 32-item questionnaire assessed demographics, achalasia knowledge, diagnostic/referral practices, HREM accessibility, and training.
- Participants represented various physician levels and specialties, including primary care, secondary, tertiary, and university hospital physicians, predominantly in internal medicine.
Main Results:
- Male physicians showed higher knowledge and diagnostic recognition compared to females.
- Gastroenterologists demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy, but easy HREM access was limited to 9.1% of respondents.
- Physicians in tertiary hospitals exhibited higher knowledge and diagnostic accuracy, while training participation and treatment familiarity did not vary by hospital type.
Conclusions:
- Variations in physician knowledge and practices across specialties, hospital types, and gender contribute to delayed achalasia recognition.
- Significant gaps in practical competence, HREM familiarity, and diagnostic resource access necessitate targeted education and interventions.
- Enhancing diagnostic infrastructure and HREM accessibility is vital for earlier achalasia diagnosis and improved patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Characteristics of Practical Op Amps
The ratio of differential gain to the common-mode gain is defined as the common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR). This ratio quantifies the ability of operational amplifiers (op-amps) to reject common-mode...
Theoretical Foundations of Nursing Practice
Theories provide a perspective to assess patients' conditions and organize data and methods. They also assist in analyzing and interpreting information. They represent a...
Equivalent Circuits for Practical Transformers
In a practical transformer, each winding exhibits resistance and leakage reactance. The...
Self-Schemas
Regression Toward the Mean
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

