Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

An Instrumented Pull Test to Characterize Postural Responses
Published on: April 6, 2019
Translation and Validation of the Canadian-French Version of the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument (BPII
Laurent Désiré Ndzié Essomba1, Yoan Bourgeault-Gagnon1, Catherine Fleury1
1Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Background:
Patient-reported outcome measures are essential tools for assessing function and quality of life. The Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument Version 2.0 (BPII 2.0) is specifically designed to evaluate adolescents and adults experiencing patellofemoral instability (PFI).
Purpose:
Because no French version was available, this study aimed to translate and validate a Canadian-French (CF) version of the BPII 2.0.
Study Design:
Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
The BPII 2.0 was translated using a forward-backward translation method (BPII 2.0-CF), following guidelines from the American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Institute for Work & Health. Participants aged ≥14, fluent in French, and with a confirmed diagnosis of PFI were included. Patients completed the questionnaire at their initial consultation, 7 days later, and 6 months after treatment. Construct validity was assessed through Spearman correlation with the Kujala score. Internal consistency was evaluated using the Cronbach alpha coefficient, and test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Responsiveness to change was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the corresponding effect size r.
Results:
A total of 45 participants were included (female, n = 33; 73%), with a median age of 21 years (range, 14-54). The median symptom duration before consultation was 48 months (range, 0.5-480.0). Mean ± SD BPII 2.0-CF scores were 38.46 ± 14.48 (N = 45), 39.52 ± 15.99 (n = 34), and 60.99 ± 20.24 (n = 29) at baseline, day 7, and 6 months after surgery, respectively. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. The construct validity of the translated BPII 2.0 and the French Kujala score at baseline was fair and statistically significant (r = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.28-0.77; P < .001). Internal consistency was acceptable with Cronbach alpha coefficient of .87. Retest reliability was good with an ICC of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.56-0.87; P < .001), and the response to change showed strong reactivity with an effect size of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.60-0.90; P < .001).
Conclusion:
The CF version of the BPII 2.0 is a valid, reliable, and appropriate tool for assessing patients with PFI. The rigorous translation and validation process supports its use in Francophone clinical settings.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Microtubule Instability
Translation
Translation is the process of synthesizing proteins from the genetic information carried by messenger RNA (mRNA). Following transcription, it constitutes the final step in the expression of genes. This process is carried out by ribosomes, complexes of protein and specialized RNA molecules. Ribosomes, transfer RNA (tRNA), and other proteins produce a chain of amino acids—the polypeptide—as the end product of translation.
Translation Produces the Building Blocks of...
Initiation of Translation
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
Termination of Translation
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...

