Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
Published on: December 15, 2023
Outcomes of Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Colonoscopy in a Tertiary Clinical Setting
Kapil D Nayar1, Abdelrahman Yakout2, Nader Bakheet2
1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Introduction:
Colonoscopies reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, but challenges remain in detecting all precancerous lesions. Operator fatigue, technique variability, and subtle lesions can lead to missed adenomas, highlighting the need for tools that standardize detection quality. Computer-aided detection (CADe) systems use artificial intelligence to enhance lesion detection and improve screening colonoscopy quality. This study evaluates the impact of CADe on key quality and efficiency metrics in a clinical setting.
Methods:
A single-center retrospective study at an academic tertiary center analyzed 4,028 colonoscopies from October 2022 to December 2023. The CADe system was used in 4 of 8 endoscopy suites, creating a CADe and control group. Propensity matching accounted for age, sex, indication, and physician. Primary outcomes included adenoma detection rate (ADR) and polyp detection rate (PDR). Adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) and polyps per colonoscopy (PPC) were also measured. Per-polyp analyses were performed as a tertiary outcome.
Results:
ADR was significantly higher in the CADe group (38.6%) vs control (34.2%) (rate ratio [RR] = 1.127, P < 0.05). PDR was significantly higher in the CADe group (67.2%) vs control (59.4%) (RR = 1.130, P < 0.05). APC was significantly higher in the CADe group (M = 0.406, SD 0.637) vs control (M = 0.359, SD 0.599) (RR = 1.131, P < 0.05). PPC was significantly higher in the CADe group (M = 1.297, SD 1.188) vs control (M = 1.046, SD 1.002) (RR = 1.240, P < 0.05). The increase in polyp resection with CADe was driven predominantly by ≤5 mm lesions, with comparatively smaller differences for larger polyps.
Discussion:
Implementing CADe in clinical practice significantly improved ADR, PDR, APC, and PPC. However, the increase in ADR seems inflated by the detection of polyps ≤5 mm, whose clinical significance in reducing colorectal cancer remains uncertain.
Related Concept Videos
Tertiary Healthcare System
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Intelligence
Nomenclature of Secondary and Tertiary Amines
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...

