Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
Claiming confidence: U.S. consumer trust in meat and poultry claims
Andrew Dilley1, Brandon R Mcfadden2, James L Mitchell2
1Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, United States.
None:
In the fall of 2024, the Food Safety and Inspection Service updated its guidelines for verifying animal-raising and environment-related claims used on meat and poultry products. Notably, revisions strongly emphasized the inclusion of third-party certifications in the supporting documents. Recent inquiries into claim validity, however, have uncovered improper approvals and compliance issues, prompting increased concerns regarding consumer confidence. This study examined consumer trust across nine claim categories explicitly defined within the guidelines. Data were collected from 1,485 respondents through a web-based survey. A best-worst scaling approach identified the most and least trusted claim categories; these data were analyzed for the entire sample and stratified by household shopping roles and meat consumption frequency. Additional questions assessed knowledge of and trust in certifying agencies (eg, U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA]) and third-party certifiers. The results reveal varying levels of trust, with consumers trusting breed and source/traceability claims most, whereas trust in animal welfare and environment-related claims was lowest. Nonetheless, all nine claim categories received generally low levels of trust. Household food-shopping roles and meat-consumption frequency had little impact on trust. Findings also show that consumers primarily trust the USDA to certify claims, and third-party certifications can enhance trust. This study offers new, quantified insights into consumer trust in food claims for meat and poultry products. While addressing trust issues, the results can guide efforts to improve consumer confidence in animal-raising and environment-related claims through targeted interventions and better labeling practices.
Related Concept Videos
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
Confidence Coefficient
Confidence Intervals
A...

