Exploring the Immigrant Health Paradox Among the Vietnamese Population in the United States

Background: The term immigrant health paradox describes how immigrants often have better health outcomes than their American-born counterparts. While existing literature treats this phenomenon as broadly generalizable, emerging research indicates that its expression varies across cultural and migration contexts. Understanding how the immigrant health paradox may appear across specific ethnic groups requires research that maps variation rather than assumes uniformity. Objectives: This study seeks to describe patterns, explore variation by nativity, and identify factors associated with well-being among the Vietnamese population in the United States (US). By focusing on descriptive trends and contextual influences, the study aims to generate new insights into how the paradox may manifest-or diverge-in the Vietnamese context. Methods: We conducted an online survey asking participants about their depressive disorders, physical and mental health status, demographics, socioeconomic status, social networks, and experiences with daily discrimination. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the study sample. Linear regression and ordinal logistic regression were performed to explore the relationships. Results: In this exploratory analysis, we did not observe indications of the Vietnamese immigrant health paradox. Material factors, especially perceptions of financial needs, as well as psychological factors, were somewhat associated with how Vietnamese people living in the US assess their health. Conclusions: The absence of the Vietnamese immigrant health paradox in the US underscores the need for nuanced health models that reflect diversity within immigrant groups. Their experiences reveal how migration histories, structural barriers, and racialization shape health outcomes in ways that differ from expectations.