Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

State-Dependency Effects on TMS: A Look at Motive Phosphene Behavior
Published on: December 28, 2010
Optimizing and assessing multichannel TMS focality
Ole Numssen1, Carla W Martin2, Torge Worbs3
1Methods and Development Group Brain Networks, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Background:
Multichannel transcranial magnetic stimulation (mTMS) enables electronic steering of induced electric fields across multiple cortical targets without physical coil repositioning, addressing key limitations of conventional single-channel TMS (sTMS). However, determining optimal input currents for focal stimulation remains challenging, and different mTMS systems have not been systematically compared under realistic hardware constraints.
Objective:
To develop an user-centric framework for optimizing and assessing mTMS focality by introducing a generic optimization algorithm, establishing meaningful quality metrics, and comparing mTMS coil arrays with traditional single-channel TMS across cortical targets.
Methods:
We developed a fast optimization framework incorporating target E-field constraints via parametrization of degenerated hyperellipsoids, explicitly integrating current-rate limits, for example from stimulator electronics and coil heating. Using high-resolution finite-element models of nine individual brains, we compared two mTMS designs (5-channel planar and 6/12-channel spherical systems) with standard sTMS figure-of-eight coils through E-field simulations. Three complementary metrics quantified stimulation quality: Focality, Target2Max, and OverstimulatedArea.
Results:
Despite using a single optimized placement for all region-of-interest targets, mTMS achieved focality comparable to repositioned single-channel TMS in this in-silico study. For superficial targets, single-channel TMS showed slightly better stimulation, but for deeper cortical targets (>25 mm skin-cortex distance), mTMS performed similarly. More mTMS channels improved focality but required stronger current-rate constraints. The planar design performed better for deeper targets, while spherical designs improved with additional channels.
Conclusion:
mTMS systems demonstrate remarkable performance comparable to standard TMS, enabling efficient multi-target stimulation without repositioning. Our open-source framework provides practical tools for designing and evaluating mTMS systems, supporting goal-directed mTMS development and effective application.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Intracellular Signaling Affects Focal Adhesions
Some...
Optimal Foraging
Optimization Problems
Optimal Arousal Theory
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
Unrealistic Optimism Bias
Optimizing Chromatographic Separations
Band broadening refers to spreading solute bands as they travel through the column. This broadening can impact resolution. Plate height (H) represents the length required for one theoretical plate. A lower plate height corresponds to...

