Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface Speller Performance Estimation with Classifier-Based Latency Estimation
Published on: September 8, 2023
Strongly coupled interface ferroelectricity and interface superconductivity in amorphous LaAlO3/KTaO3(111)
M D Dong1,2,3, X B Cheng1,2,3, M Zhang4
1Department of Physics, School of Science, Westlake University, Hangzhou, 310024, China.
None:
Interfaces can differ from their parent compounds in charge, spin, and orbital orders, providing fertile ground for emergent phenomena, strongly correlated physics, and novel device applications. Here, we present evidence of a ferroelectric order at the interface of two oxides, amorphous LaAlO3/KTaO3(111), where two seemingly mutually exclusive orders-ferroelectricity and superconductivity-coexist. Ferroelectricity is confirmed through scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy, and piezoelectric force microscopy (PFM). STEM reveals a displacement of K atoms relative to Ta atoms, facilitated by oxygen vacancies at the LAO/KTO interface. The resulting ferroelectric polarization is locally switchable by applying a voltage between the PFM tip and the LaAlO3 film. Flipping ferroelectric polarization reduces interfacial conductivity by more than 1000 times, simultaneously suppresses superconductivity. Moreover, the ferroelectric hysteresis correlates with hysteretic changes in interfacial conductivity and the superconducting transition temperature (Tc), providing clear evidence of coupling between ferroelectricity and superconductivity. These findings open a pathway to ferroelectric superconductivity with broken inversion symmetry and non-volatile control of superconductivity.
Related Concept Videos
Protein-protein Interfaces
Protein-Protein Interfaces
Factors Affecting Dissolution: Polymorphism, Amorphism and Pseudopolymorphism
Some polymorphic crystals possess lower aqueous solubility than their amorphous counterparts, leading to incomplete absorption. For instance, the oral suspension of Chloramphenicol, which...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
G-protein Coupled Receptors

