Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Normothermic Ex Vivo Kidney Perfusion for the Preservation of Kidney Grafts prior to Transplantation
Published on: July 15, 2015
Changes by Era in Risk Factors and Outcomes Among Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients With Delayed Graft
Camille C Ylagan1, Paul E Schindler1, Dave B Patel1
1Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Delayed graft function (DGF) in deceased donor kidney transplants has evolving risk factors. Recent eras show improved outcomes, particularly reduced acute rejection, suggesting better management strategies for kidney transplant recipients.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Transplantation Surgery
- Immunology
Background:
- Delayed graft function (DGF) is a significant complication in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (DDKTRs).
- Currently, no effective therapeutic agents exist for preventing or treating DGF.
- Predicting DGF and its associated outcomes relies on donor and recipient factors, which may change over time.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the temporal trends in risk factors for DGF.
- To evaluate changes in DGF incidence and associated outcomes over different eras.
- To assess the impact of evolving medical practices on DGF and kidney transplant success.
Main Methods:
- Deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (DDKTRs) were categorized into four eras based on transplant year (2000-2005, 2006-2011, 2012-2017, 2018-2021).
- Risk factors for DGF, one-year graft failure (uncensored and death-censored), death with a functioning graft, and acute rejection were analyzed by era.
- Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant associations within and across eras.
Main Results:
- The incidence of DGF varied significantly across the four eras.
- Recent eras demonstrated a shorter duration of DGF and lower median dialysis counts.
- Donation after circulatory death, higher donor creatinine, and longer pre-transplant dialysis were DGF risk factors, while preemptive transplant was protective.
- Acute rejection risk substantially decreased in later eras (E3 and E4) compared to the earliest era (E1).
- Trends indicated reduced risks for uncensored graft failure and death with a functioning graft in more recent eras.
Conclusions:
- Risk factors for DGF have shown both consistent and changing patterns over time.
- Improved management strategies have likely contributed to the observed reduction in acute rejection among DGF patients in recent eras.
- Recent transplant eras show promising trends towards improved graft survival and patient survival post-kidney transplantation.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations

