Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

An Immunohistopathologic Study to Profile the Folate Receptor Beta Macrophage and Vascular Immune Microenvironment in Giant Cell Arteritis
Published on: February 8, 2019
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for JCS 2026 Guideline on Management of Large-Vessel Vasculitis
Tsuyoshi Shirai1, Tsuneyasu Yoshida2, Eri Sugano3
1Department of Rheumatology, Tohoku University Hospital.
This review of randomized controlled trials for large-vessel vasculitis found limited evidence for Takayasu arteritis. Tocilizumab showed promise for giant cell arteritis, reducing relapse and increasing remission rates.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Immunology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) encompasses Takayasu arteritis (TAK) and giant cell arteritis (GCA).
- Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is crucial for updating clinical practice guidelines.
- The 2026 Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) guideline requires robust evidence synthesis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review RCTs for LVV therapies.
- To provide evidence for the 2026 JCS clinical practice guideline on LVV.
- To inform treatment decisions for Takayasu arteritis and giant cell arteritis.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a systematic review of RCTs using major databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, EMBASE, JMAS) through March 2024.
- Drafted clinical questions for TAK and GCA.
- Assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.
Main Results:
- Evidence for Takayasu arteritis (TAK) was limited.
- Tocilizumab (TCZ) showed a numerical benefit in relapse rate for TAK versus placebo and was similar to adalimumab.
- In giant cell arteritis (GCA), TCZ significantly reduced relapse and increased remission rates compared to placebo at 52 weeks; other agents showed no benefit in cranial GCA.
Conclusions:
- This systematic review provides a comprehensive synthesis of RCT evidence for LVV therapies.
- The findings support the development of the 2026 JCS clinical practice guideline.
- The certainty of evidence for most outcomes was low to very low, highlighting the need for further research.
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Nephrotic Syndrome II : Assessment and Medical Management

