Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Challenging hierarchies and fostering collaboration: a critical discourse analysis of interprofessional education in
Emma M Zorda1, Mikayla A Sargent1, Cara E Gose1
1College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of New England, Biddeford, ME, USA.
Context:
Interprofessional education (IPE) in health professions training strives to create a future collaborative healthcare workforce for the betterment of patient care. One of the aims of IPE experiences is to challenge healthcare hierarchies, with a focus on fluid leadership among healthcare team members. This promotes improved patient-care experience, as well as addressing patient well-being in a more holistic manner.
Objectives:
This study aimed to critically analyze the discourse of an interprofessional team of healthcare students following a simulated patient encounter to assess the power dynamic among the professions present.
Methods:
Researchers critically analyzed the discourse from student Interprofessional Team Immersion (IPTI) simulation debrief sessions. Sessions were transcribed and the discourse was coded utilizing Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) core competencies. A critical discourse analysis (CDA) was employed as a methodology to identify the prevalence of utilitarian and emancipatory discourse among students in diverse health professions and how collaborative interprofessional teamwork and patient health outcomes are impacted.
Results:
Student teams modeled emancipatory and utilitarian discourses to structure team debriefs. The first debrief session operated through utilitarian discursivity, demonstrating instances of individual insecurity, slow team growth, and less coordinated patient care. Analysis of the second debrief session demonstrated the use of emancipatory discourse through the presence of greater team cohesiveness, less focus on self, and greater collaborative focus on patient care. Furthermore, analysis suggests the presence of fluid leadership with no dominant, healthcare profession (HCP)-specific hierarchy.
Conclusions:
Employing a critical discursive lens in healthcare education can help students challenge power imbalances and shift toward fluid leadership and increase team cohesion between HCPs. These findings highlight how IPE can lead to greater collaboration between interprofessional student team members, challenge hierarchy, and empower the healthcare team to provide improved patient care.
Related Concept Videos
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
