Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

A Modified QuEChERS-HPLC Method for Detection of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Zebrafish Embryos Exposed to Fine Particulate Matter
Published on: June 13, 2025
Considerations for the Analysis of Urinary Environmental Chemical Concentrations During Pregnancy
Danielle R Stevens1,2, Kaleigh Hinton1,3, Katie M O'Brien1
1Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC.
Background:
Pregnancy physiology may impact indicators of hydration, affecting exposure assessment in gestational studies with urinary chemical biomarkers.
Methods:
We aimed to characterize hydration and demonstrate the impact of different methods for standardizing urinary chemical biomarker concentrations on exposure descriptives in the Human Placenta and Phthalates Study (n = 303, 2017-2020), a prospective pregnancy cohort with eight study visits between 12 and 38 weeks of gestation. We assessed trajectories and predictors of hydration using urine flow rate (UFR) and specific gravity (SG). Likewise, we examined trajectories and predictors of mono-n-butyl phthalate (MBP), for which concentrations were unstandardized or standardized via UFR (analyte excretion rates), SG alone (Boeniger method), or covariate-adjusted SG (O'Brien method). We used generalized additive mixed effects models to examine trajectories. We used linear mixed effects models to investigate participant demographic and pregnancy characteristics influencing UFR and SG, and agreement between unstandardized and standardized MBP concentrations.
Results:
As pregnancy progressed, SG declined linearly, whereas UFR varied in a nonlinear manner. Several demographic and pregnancy characteristics, notably race and ethnicity, were associated with UFR and SG. Unstandardized and standardized MBP concentrations showed good agreement, with lower agreement observed between concentrations standardized using UFR (analyte excretion rates) relative to SG (Boeniger and O'Brien methods). Nevertheless, trajectories and predictors of MBP concentrations were similar across all standardization approaches.
Conclusions:
Despite systematic variations in hydration across gestation and by demographic and pregnancy characteristics, methods commonly used for standardizing urinary concentrations of chemical biomarkers were robust to differences in the hydration indicator as well as the standardization method employed.
More Related Videos
07:26A Simple Method for Automated Solid Phase Extraction of Water Samples for Immunological Analysis of Small Pollutants
Published on: January 1, 2016
09:49Use of a Battery of Chemical and Ecotoxicological Methods for the Assessment of the Efficacy of Wastewater Treatment Processes to Remove Estrogenic Potency
Published on: September 11, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Urine Studies I: Urinalysis
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Types of Toxins
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...