Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
Published on: March 8, 2018
Barriers and Facilitators to Screening for Anxiety and Intimate Partner Violence
Amy G Cantor1, Chrystal Barnes2, Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman2
1From the Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC, MP, KB); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC, SL-A, TW-L); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (AGC); Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (CB); and Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA (HDN). cantor@ohsu.edu.
Background:
Periodic universal screening for anxiety and for intimate partner violence (IPV) for women and adolescent girls are national clinical practice recommendations. However, screening rates in primary care settings are low. This study aimed to increase awareness and adoption of screening for anxiety and for IPV in women and adolescent girls by identifying screening barriers and facilitators to inform clinical resource development.
Methods:
Two-phase, qualitative study using semistructured interviews to identify screening barriers and facilitators; thematic analysis of interview data using a rapid evaluation approach.
Results:
Twenty-seven clinicians and staff members were interviewed in 12 clinics in 2 primary care networks in Oregon. All participants recognized the importance of screening in primary care settings but were generally unaware of screening recommendations and insurance coverage and were unsure of their clinic's policies and practices, citing a lack of protocols for referrals for positive screens. Barriers to both anxiety and IPV screening included screening fatigue, lack of metrics, uncertain documentation and reporting, and unclear referral and follow-up procedures. For IPV screening specifically, barriers included discomfort with screening, privacy concerns, and perceived low occurrence. Facilitators for both services included leveraging existing screening practices and electronic health record tools, and clear recommendations for universal screening best practices.
Conclusion:
Implementation of routine screening for anxiety and IPV in women and adolescents in primary care is low but may improve with targeted clinician resources and education. Workflow diagrams and resource guides responsive to identified screening barriers and facilitators, including clarification of insurance coverage for preventive services, and resources to support implementation of protocols of screening methods, clinical documentation, and referrals for anxiety and IPV in primary care settings, could improve screening practices.
Related Concept Videos
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood
Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Social Anxiety Disorder
Anxiety: Overview
Individuals with anxiety often experience a range of physical and emotional symptoms, including sweating, trembling, tachycardia, and disturbances in sleep patterns. These symptoms vary in intensity and frequency but are generally disruptive and distressing.
Barriers to Effective Communication I
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this...

