Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Author Spotlight: Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Comprehensive Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta
Published on: September 8, 2023
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Abdominal Pain-Child
, HaiThuy N Nguyen1, Sherwin S Chan2
1Children's Hospital Los Angeles and Keck School of Medicine USC, Los Angeles, California.
Insights
Pediatric abdominal pain diagnosis often requires imaging due to a broad differential and children's limited communication. This review discusses appropriate imaging for various acute abdominal pain scenarios in children, guided by evidence-based criteria.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Radiology
- Gastroenterology
- Clinical Decision Support
Background:
- Abdominal pain in children presents a broad differential diagnosis that can vary significantly with age.
- Children's difficulty in articulating pain necessitates the use of diagnostic imaging for accurate assessment.
- Acute abdominal pain in pediatric patients requires a systematic approach to diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review appropriate diagnostic imaging strategies for children presenting with acute abdominal pain.
- To discuss imaging modalities for specific conditions including constipation, intussusception, small bowel obstruction, surgical complications, and necrotizing enterocolitis.
- To highlight the role of evidence-based guidelines in pediatric abdominal pain management.
Main Methods:
- The study discusses various clinical scenarios of acute abdominal pain in children.
- It outlines initial imaging studies deemed appropriate or potentially appropriate based on evidence and expert consensus.
- The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria methodology, including GRADE and RAND/UCLA methods, is referenced for guideline development.
Main Results:
- The review details appropriate imaging for common pediatric abdominal pain causes like constipation and intussusception.
- It addresses imaging considerations for complex cases such as small bowel obstruction and necrotizing enterocolitis.
- The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria serve as a foundation for evidence-based recommendations.
Conclusions:
- Diagnostic imaging is crucial for evaluating acute abdominal pain in children due to diagnostic complexity.
- Evidence-based guidelines, like the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria, aid in selecting appropriate imaging studies.
- Expert consensus plays a vital role when peer-reviewed literature is limited for specific pediatric abdominal pain presentations.
Abstract:
The range of pathology that can produce abdominal pain in children not only is broad, but can vary with age. Due to the wide differential and the inability for a child to clearly identify and describe the nature of their abdominal pain, diagnostic imaging is often needed. Various clinical scenarios are discussed for a child presenting with acute abdominal pain. Initial imaging studies that are usually appropriate or may be appropriate (based on the best available evidence or expert consensus) for suspected constipation, intussusception, small bowel obstruction without history of surgery, surgical complications, and necrotizing enterocolitis are discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
More Related Videos
05:50Author Spotlight: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Content Assessment and Risk Stratification in Perioperative Care
Published on: September 22, 2023
08:22The Application of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography (POCUS) in the Management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in the Intensive Care Unit
Published on: December 12, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Abdominal Regions and Quadrants
The simpler quadrants approach, which is more commonly used in medicine, subdivides the cavity with one horizontal and one vertical line that intersects at the patient's umbilicus (navel). The four...
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.