Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Non-Verbal Cues01:29

Non-Verbal Cues

353
Non-verbal communication extends beyond gestures and facial expressions to include vocal elements known as paralanguage. Paralanguage consists of non-verbal vocal cues such as pitch, loudness, speech rate, pauses, and non-verbal vocalizations like laughter, sighs, and moans. These elements not only accompany speech but also provide critical emotional and contextual information.The Role of Paralanguage in CommunicationParalanguage adds depth to spoken language by conveying emotions and...
353

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural mechanisms of learned suppression uncovered by probing the hidden attentional priority map.

eLife·2025
Same author

Effects of Context Changes on Memory Reactivation.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2024
Same author

Attentional suppression is in place before display onset.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2023
Same author

Hippocampal convergence during anticipatory midbrain activation promotes subsequent memory formation.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

Assessing the Durability of One-Shot Stimulus-Control Bindings.

Journal of cognition·2022
Same author

Learning from mistakes: Incidental encoding reveals a time-dependent enhancement of posterror target processing.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.6K

When forewarned is not forearmed: No evidence for cue-based proactive control in the spatial Stroop task.

Changrun Huang1, Tobias Egner1

  • 1Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|February 17, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People cannot reliably use advance cues for proactive conflict control, even with nonarbitrary stimulus-response mappings. This challenges the idea of proactive control as a general mental mechanism.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.6K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Behavior

Background:

  • Advance cues are assumed to enable proactive conflict preparation.
  • Empirical evidence for cue effectiveness in conflict resolution is inconsistent.
  • Nonarbitrary stimulus-response (S-R) mappings are hypothesized to enhance cue benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if nonarbitrary S-R mappings ensure cue effectiveness for proactive conflict control.
  • To test the hypothesis that nonarbitrary S-R mappings are a key determinant of cue effectiveness.
  • To challenge the assumption of proactive control as a domain-general mechanism.

Main Methods:

  • Five experiments using a spatial Stroop task with nonarbitrary S-R mappings.
  • Utilized optimal preparation conditions: 100% valid cues and 2,000 ms preparation time.
  • Manipulated task difficulty, including stimulus presentation time (50 ms in Experiment 4).

Main Results:

  • Consistently found no evidence of proactive cue use to resolve conflict on incongruent trials.
  • Cue benefits only emerged on congruent trials under high task difficulty.
  • Observed effects likely reflect strategic shortcuts, not enhanced proactive control.

Conclusions:

  • Nonarbitrary S-R mappings are not sufficient for engaging proactive control via cues.
  • The study challenges the view of proactive control as a readily deployable, domain-general mechanism.
  • Findings suggest limitations in how advance cues facilitate cognitive control.