Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Outliers and Influential Points01:08

Outliers and Influential Points

6.4K
An outlier is an observation of data that does not fit the rest of the data. It is sometimes called an extreme value. When you graph an outlier, it will appear not to fit the pattern of the graph. Some outliers are due to mistakes (for example, writing down 50 instead of 500), while others may indicate that something unusual is happening. Outliers are present far from the least squares line in the vertical direction. They have large "errors," where the "error" or residual is the...
6.4K
What Are Outliers?01:12

What Are Outliers?

5.3K
Outliers are observed data points that are far from the least squares line. They have unusual values and need to be examined carefully. Though an outlier may result from erroneous data, at other times, it may hold valuable information about the population under study and should be included in the data. Hence, it is crucial to examine what causes a data point to be an outlier.
The z score is used to find outliers or unusual values. It should be noted that any values beyond -2 and +2 are...
5.3K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.1K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.1K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

4.2K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
4.2K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

6.1K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
6.1K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.1K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceptual Learning and Predictability of Children's Speech.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025
Same author

Does the Spatiotemporal Index (STI) Overestimate Instability in Slow Speech? Investigating Template Effects on the STI Across Different Speaking Rates.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025
Same author

Rephrasing Messages on Demand: Effects on Speech Production in Parkinson's Disease.

American journal of speech-language pathology·2025
Same author

Assessing Fundamental Frequency Variation in Speakers With Parkinson's Disease: Effects of Tracking Errors.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025
Same author

The Benefits of Robustness in Measures of Spatiotemporal Stability: An Investigation in Childhood Apraxia of Speech.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2024
Same author

Validating the Influences of Methodological Decisions on Assessing the Spatiotemporal Stability of Speech Movement Sequences Using Children's Speech Data.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2024
Same journal

Characterization of genomic diversity in bacteriophages infecting Rhodococcus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of the Responding to Experienced and Anticipated Discrimination (READ) training on reducing stigma for medical students in Tunisia.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Cell-cell junction gene signatures as subtype-specific prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

GC-MS based tentative identification of γ-sitosterol from Brassica nigra seeds and evaluation of its anticancer potential: An integrated in vitro and in silico study.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Ad-based social media interventions increase belief accuracy and generate pro-social opinions among non-news readers.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Negotiating knowledge: The role of network hedging in the production of high-impact science.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

6.8K

Outliers (typically) cannot cause type I errors in one-sample/paired t-tests.

Alan Wisler1

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, United States of America.

Plos One
|February 17, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Outliers can rarely cause false positives in one-sample t-tests. This occurs under specific conditions, including a concordant outlier, minimum sample size, and small effect size, suggesting low risk in most practical scenarios.

More Related Videos

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

2.5K
Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget
05:57

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Published on: November 20, 2018

59.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

6.8K
Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

2.5K
Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget
05:57

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Published on: November 20, 2018

59.3K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Statistical modeling
  • Hypothesis testing

Background:

  • Outlying data points significantly impact statistical modeling and significance testing.
  • Prior research indicates outliers often lead to failing to reject the null hypothesis in one-sample t-tests.
  • This study explores the less common scenario where outliers can incorrectly lead to rejecting the null hypothesis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the conditions under which an outlier can cause the rejection of the null hypothesis in one-sample t-tests.
  • To establish mathematical bounds for outliers that increase the t-statistic.
  • To assess the practical implications of these findings on Type I error rates.

Main Methods:

  • Development of mathematical bounds to determine the maximum size of an outlier that can increase a sample's t-statistic.
  • Validation of these bounds using Monte-Carlo simulations.
  • Analysis of available data sets to support the theoretical findings.

Main Results:

  • Outliers can cause significant results in one-sample t-tests, but only under narrow circumstances.
  • Key conditions include the presence of a concordant outlier, a minimum sample size (n ≥ 10), and a small effect size (Cohen's d < 0.5).
  • The risk of isolated outliers causing Type I errors is generally low, particularly with small sample sizes.

Conclusions:

  • While outliers can lead to Type I errors in one-sample t-tests, the specific conditions required make this a rare event.
  • The findings suggest that statistical analyses are robust to outliers in many practical situations.
  • Researchers should be aware of these specific conditions when interpreting results from t-tests, especially with larger sample sizes or strong effects.