Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026
Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
Published on: February 21, 2025
Accuracy of Optical Heart Rate Measurements for 10 Commercial Wearables in Different Climate Conditions and
Jasper Gielen1, Catharina Nina Van Oost1, Glen Debard2
1Department of Biosystems, Research group M3-BIORES, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 30, Leuven, 3001, Belgium, +3216377112.
Background:
Commercial wearable devices allow for continuous heart rate (HR) monitoring in daily life. Their accuracy under ecologically valid conditions, however, remains insufficiently independently tested, especially during irregular activity, cognitive stress, and variable climates.
Objective:
This study evaluated the HR accuracy of 10 commercially available wearables under controlled variations in physical activity, cognitive stress, and temperature. We hypothesized that physical activity irregularity, cognitive stress, and thermal climate conditions would affect measurement accuracy.
Methods:
Forty-five healthy adults (21-68, mean 34, SD 12 y) completed a standardized protocol in climate-controlled chambers simulating neutral (23 °C), hot (36 °C), and cold (10 °C) conditions. Tasks included rest, cognitive stress (Montreal Imaging Stress Task), steady walking, and intermittent walking. Each of the 10 devices (Fitbit Charge 6, Fitbit Inspire 3, Garmin Vivosmart 5, Garmin Vivoactive 5, Apple Watch SE, Google Pixel Watch 2, Polar Ignite 3, Polar Pacer, Xiaomi Watch 2, and Oura Ring Gen 3) was compared against electrocardiogram-derived HR from a Zephyr BioHarness chest strap. Accuracy was assessed using mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), repeated-measures concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and Bland-Altman analysis.
Results:
Significant variability across the devices was observed. Fitbit Charge 6 (MAE 4.5 bpm, MAPE 5.5%, CCC 0.93) and Google Pixel Watch 2 (MAE 4.9 bpm, MAPE 6.7%, CCC 0.87) showed strong agreement with the gold standard. In contrast, Fitbit Inspire 3, Polar Ignite 3, Polar Pacer, and Oura Ring displayed larger errors (MAE 9-14 bpm, MAPE 11%-16%) and lower CCC values (0.45-0.66). The climate conditions did not significantly affect the measurement accuracy of the test devices. The activity type, however, did have a significant effect: intermittent walking increased errors for multiple devices.
Conclusions:
Wearable HR measurement accuracy is device-specific and context-dependent. Moderate climates did not impair performance, but irregular movement reduced accuracy. Fitbit Charge 6 and Google Pixel Watch 2 demonstrated the highest reliability, supporting their use in health and sports monitoring. Careful device selection and context-aware interpretation remain critical for applied and clinical applications.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Factors Influencing Heart Rate
Let us explore the significant factors affecting heart rate, including age, body temperature, posture, acute pain, chemical influences,...
01:13Equipments Used to Measure Body Temperature
Glass-bulb Thermometer:
Glass-bulb thermometers are hollow glass tubes with a bulb tip containing liquid such as ethanol or mercury. Historically, glass bulb mercury thermometers were the standard device to measure body temperature. Today, mercury thermometers are prohibited in many countries due to the hazardous effects of mercury and the risk of exposure if the glass bulb breaks. In general,...
01:13Special considerations while measuring pulse
01:19Special considerations while measuring oxygen saturation
Ensuring accuracy in vital sign recordings while prioritizing patient comfort and minimizing anxiety is...
01:19Assessing Body Temperature - Temporal Artery
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and don a fresh pair of gloves to prevent cross-infection and ensure patient safety.
Step 2: Explain the procedure to the patient to establish trust. Clear communication establishes trust with the patient, ensures they understand what to expect, promotes cooperation, and enhances comfort during the procedure.
Step 3: Assess the patient's...
01:30Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...