Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

A Modified Cuff Technique for Mouse Cervical Heterotopic Heart Transplantation Model
Published on: February 7, 2022
MECKI score thresholds for heart transplantation referral of ambulatory heart failure patients
Piergiuseppe Agostoni1,2, Arianna Galotta2, Elisabetta Salvioni2
1Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Cardiovascular Section, University of Milan, Via Parea 4, 20138, Milan, Italy.
Insights
The MECKI score can help determine heart transplant eligibility in heart failure patients. A score of 0.1368 or higher suggests a patient may need a transplant, while lower scores indicate deferral.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Prognostic Biomarkers
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) management guidelines recommend prognostic scores for assessing outcomes and heart transplant (HTX) eligibility.
- Current utilization of these scores is limited, with poorly established cut-off values for HTX listing.
- The MECKI score offers potential for superior prognostic accuracy and ease of calculation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare MECKI score-based survival rates with those of HTX recipients.
- To identify a MECKI score threshold indicating survival inferior to that of HTX recipients at 5 years.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 3865 ambulatory HF patients in the MECKI score program (2010-2022).
- Primary endpoint: composite of cardiovascular death, HTX, or left ventricular assist device implantation.
- Comparison with 5-year survival data from the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation registry.
- Stratification by MECKI score deciles to determine the prognostic threshold.
Main Results:
- Mean 5-year survival for HF patients was 83.7%.
- Average 5-year survival for HTX recipients was 71.2%.
- The MECKI score threshold of ≥0.1368 was identified, below which prognosis is worse than for HTX recipients.
Conclusions:
- A MECKI score of 0.1368 or higher may indicate eligibility for heart transplant listing.
- Lower MECKI scores support clinical deferral of heart transplantation.
Introduction:
In heart failure (HF) patients, guidelines recommend scores for assessing outcomes and heart transplant (HTX) eligibility. However, scores use remains limited and cut-off values for HTX listing not well established.Among the available tools, MECKI score is easy to calculate and likely offers the best prognostic accuracy. Compare MECKI score-based survival with that of HTX recipients and identify a MECKI threshold above which survival is inferior to that of HTX recipients at 5-year.
Methods:
Consecutive ambulatory HF patients enrolled in MECKI score programme between January 2010 and January 2022 were evaluated. Primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, HTX, or left ventricular assist device implantation. Heart transplant survival data were obtained from the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation registry updated through 2023. To identify the MECKI score threshold beyond which prognosis is worse than that of HTX recipients, patients were stratified by deciles of MECKI score.
Results:
We analysed 3865 HF patients (mean age 62.4 ± 12.6 years). Peak VO₂ was 58.2 ± 18.3% predicted; VE/VCO₂ slope 33.2 ± 8.2, haemoglobin 13.5 ± 1.7 g/dL, Na⁺ 139 ± 3 mmol/L, LVEF 33.7 ± 10.4%, and eGFR 73 ± 26 mL/min/1.73 m². Periodic breathing occurred in 15.8% of patients. At 5 years, mean survival was 83.7%.The average 5-year survival of HTX recipients (71.2%) lies between the eighth and ninth MECKI score deciles suggesting a MECKI score value ≥0.1368 as the proper cut-off for HTX listing.
Conclusion:
MECKI score ≥0.1368 may warrant HTX listing, while lower scores support clinical deferral.
More Related Videos
12:40A Modified Murine Heterotopic Heart Transplant Protocol Matching Contemporary Standards of Aseptic Technique, Anesthesia, and Analgesia
Published on: September 28, 2022
08:49Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
Published on: August 2, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care