Understanding the mechanisms of TAVI durability through computational modelling: a multidisciplinary review
Elisa Rauseo1,2,3, Laura Bevis3,4, Xu Chen3,5
1William Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
None:
As transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) expands to younger populations, durability has become a concern, requiring a lifetime rather than a single-procedure perspective. While clinical trials suggest comparable mid-term performance to surgical bioprostheses, data beyond 10 years remain limited, particularly for bicuspid valves, valve-in-valve procedures, and complex anatomies. Computational modelling combines patient anatomy and device design in computer-based simulations to study valve performance under physiological loading. Applied to TAVI, these models can reproduce implantation, evaluate mechanical stresses, and simulate blood flow, providing mechanistic insights into deterioration processes, including altered leaflet loading, stent deformation, and thrombosis-prone flow. Although these simulations do not directly assess durability, they use surrogate metrics linked with these mechanisms, helping identify factors that may influence longevity and guide design and procedural refinements. Clinically, modelling could support patient-specific planning and reintervention strategies, informing decisions across the valve-replacement pathway, an important consideration as younger patients are likely to undergo multiple lifetime procedures. Integrating these tools into pre-procedural planning may help anticipate challenges such as coronary access, annular geometry, and redo feasibility. However, current studies report elements of verification and field-level validation, but none complete a pre-specified, calibrated surrogate-to-outcome validation with uncertainty/sensitivity analysis; thus, durability predictions remain exploratory. Progress needs transparent verification, field checks vs. bench or imaging, surrogate calibration to data, outcome testing in independent cohorts, and routine uncertainty/sensitivity reporting, with close clinician-engineer collaboration. This review underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach and provides a critical analysis of the available tools and their potential to advance long-term outcomes.
More Related Videos
11:28A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
06:54A Virtual Simulation Experiment of Mechanics: Material Deformation and Failure Based on Scanning Electron Microscopy
Published on: January 20, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Fatigue
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...
Stresses under Combined Loadings
The process begins by slicing the tube at critical points and analyzing the internal forces and stress components at these sections, focusing on the centroid. Normal stresses, generated by axial forces and bending moments, are either compressive or tensile and vary across the section from...
Factors Affecting Creep
Further, the water/cement ratio is critical, as a lower ratio increases concrete strength, thus reducing creep. The strength of the...
Design of Transmission Shafts - Stress Analysis
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models I
