Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Finite Element Modelling of a Cellular Electric Microenvironment
Published on: May 18, 2021
Beyond Partitioning: Using Force Field Science to Evaluate Electrostatics Models
A Najla Hosseini1, Kristian Kříž1, David van der Spoel1
1Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 596, SE-75124 Uppsala, Sweden.
None:
Accurate models for electrostatic and induction interactions are fundamental for computational molecular science, including drug discovery, studies of biomolecular systems and materials design. Given a precise model of the entire charge distributions, the electrostatic interaction between molecules can be calculated accurately using Coulomb's law. Here, we evaluate partitioning methods for deriving charges from electron density as well as the popular method of fitting point charges for use in force field calculations to the electrostatic potential (ESP). For the data set used in this work, which consists of charged amino-acid side chain analogs, inorganic ions and water, the best of these methods yield a root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of 17 kJ/mol. By combining positive point charges (PC) with Gaussian or Slater distributed negative charges, ESP-fitted models predict electrostatic interactions approximately 30% better than just point charges (RMSD 12 kJ/mol), similar to the Minimal Basis Iterative Stockholder (MBIS-S) method [Verstraelen, T. . J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 3894-3912.]that employs a PC and a Slater charge as well. Since interaction energies are perhaps the most important deliverable of force field calculations, it may be advantageous to train models directly to reproduce energy components from symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) calculations, rather than taking a detour through monomer-based charge models. To this end, we employ machine learning using the Alexandria Chemistry Toolkit [van der Spoel, D. . Digit. Discovery 2025, 4, 1925-1935.] to generate parameters for multiple physics-based models that reproduce electrostatic and, optionally, induction interaction energies from SAPT calculations of compound dimers. For a nonpolarizable model combining a PC and a Gaussian distributed charge on the core, the RMSD drops to 3 kJ/mol thanks to direct training on dimer energy components. The approach outlined in this work consists of applying force field science to make apples-to-apples comparisons between models and machine learning to design physics-based force fields that yield interaction energies consistent with SAPT calculations. Together, these tools will enable rapid progress in force field development and enhance the predictive power of molecular simulations for applications in many fields of science.
Related Concept Videos
Electrostatic Boundary Conditions in Dielectrics
Consider a case where both the mediums across a boundary are two different dielectric materials. Recall that the electric field and electric displacement are proportional and related through the material's permittivity....
Electrostatic Boundary Conditions
The surface integral of an electric field is given by Gauss's law in integral form and is related to...
Types of Forces
Electric Field
In the new picture, imagine that the first charge sets up an electric field independent of all other charges in the universe. When another charge comes in its vicinity, the second charge experiences an electric force depending on the electric field at that point. The source charge does not...
Determining Electric Field From Electric Potential
In general, regardless of whether the electric field is uniform, it points in the direction of decreasing potential because the force on a positive...
Electric Field of Two Equal and Opposite Charges
A separation of the positive and negative charges can lead to a weak, remnant effect of the positive and negative charges. The expectation is that the more the distance between the positive and...

