Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.8K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.8K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.6K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.6K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.4K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.4K
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

641
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
641
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

2.3K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
2.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

1.2K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clarifying the 'set to zero' approach for time-varying prenatal exposures.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Rejoinder to the discussion on 'Causal inference with misspecified network interference structure'.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Learn-As-you-GO (LAGO) trials: optimizing treatments and preventing trial failure through ongoing learning.

Biometrics·2025
Same author

The subtype-free average causal effect for heterogeneous disease etiology.

Biometrics·2025
Same author

Ambient temperature exposure and rapid infant weight gain.

International journal of epidemiology·2024
Same author

A sensitivity analysis approach for the causal hazard ratio in randomized and observational studies.

Biometrics·2022
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian phase I/II platform design with data augmentation accounting for delayed outcomes.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

8.5K

Causal inference with misspecified network interference structure.

Bar Weinstein1, Daniel Nevo1

  • 1Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel.

Biometrics
|February 23, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Network misspecification in causal inference can bias results. This study introduces a robust estimator that remains unbiased if any of the multiple tested networks are correct, mitigating bias from incorrect network assumptions.

Keywords:
SUTVAexposure mappingmulti-layer networksnetwork experimentsspillovers

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis
05:59

Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis

Published on: October 6, 2023

3.4K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

8.5K
Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis
05:59

Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis

Published on: October 6, 2023

3.4K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.1K

Area of Science:

  • Causal inference
  • Network analysis
  • Social network analysis

Background:

  • Interference between units is common in many fields.
  • Interference patterns are often modeled using networks.
  • Accurate network specification is crucial but challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the consequences of network misspecification in causal effect estimation.
  • To develop a novel estimator robust to network misspecification.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of bias bounds for misspecified networks.
  • Quantification of bias using induced exposure probabilities.
  • Development of a novel estimator leveraging multiple networks.

Main Results:

  • Estimation bias increases with network divergence.
  • The proposed estimator is unbiased if at least one network is correct.
  • Simulations and field experiment demonstrate estimator utility.

Conclusions:

  • Network misspecification poses a significant challenge in causal inference.
  • The proposed multi-network estimator offers robustness to network specification errors.
  • This approach enhances the reliability of causal effect estimation in networked settings.